Li Jing, Gu Jian
College of Pharmacy, Southwest University for Nationalities, No.16 South 4th Section, 1st Ring Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;22(5):807-816. doi: 10.1007/s10147-017-1167-1. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
The fatigue associated with five newly approved vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) (regorafenib, vandetanib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, axitinib) is poorly understood. We conducted this systematic review to fully investigate the fatigue associated with these VEGFR-TKIs in cancer patients. Relevant studies of randomized controlled trials in cancer patients treated with the five VEGFR-TKIs were retrieved and a systematic evaluation was conducted. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched for articles published until March 2017. Thirteen randomized controlled trials and 4395 patients were included. The current analysis suggested that the use of five newly approved VEGFR-TKIs increased the risk of all-grade fatigue (1.43; 95% CI 1.23-1.66; p < 0.00001) and high-grade (≥grade 3) fatigue (1.97; 95% CI1.44-2.70; p < 0.0001). On subgroup analysis, the risk ratio (RR) of all-grade fatigue varied significantly within drug type, but high-grade fatigue did not. The RR of all-grade and high-grade fatigue did not vary significantly according to cancer type, treatment line, and treatment duration. The risk of high-grade fatigue may vary with treatment duration, whereas all-grade fatigue may not. The available data suggest that the use of the five newly approved VEGFR-TKIs is associated with a significantly increased risk of fatigue in cancer patients. Physicians should be aware of this adverse effect and should monitor cancer patients receiving these drugs.
与五种新批准的血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGFR-TKI)(瑞戈非尼、凡德他尼、卡博替尼、乐伐替尼、阿昔替尼)相关的疲劳情况目前还了解甚少。我们开展了这项系统评价,以全面调查癌症患者中与这些VEGFR-TKI相关的疲劳情况。检索了有关接受这五种VEGFR-TKI治疗的癌症患者的随机对照试验的相关研究,并进行了系统评价。在EMBASE、MEDLINE和PubMed中检索截至2017年3月发表的文章。纳入了13项随机对照试验和4395例患者。当前分析表明,使用五种新批准的VEGFR-TKI会增加全等级疲劳(1.43;95%CI 1.23 - 1.66;p < 0.00001)和高级别(≥3级)疲劳(1.97;95%CI 1.44 - 2.70;p < 0.0001)的风险。亚组分析显示,全等级疲劳的风险比(RR)在药物类型之间差异显著,但高级别疲劳并非如此。全等级和高级别疲劳的RR在癌症类型、治疗线数和治疗持续时间方面无显著差异。高级别疲劳的风险可能随治疗持续时间而变化,而全等级疲劳可能并非如此。现有数据表明,使用五种新批准的VEGFR-TKI与癌症患者疲劳风险显著增加相关。医生应意识到这种不良反应,并应对接受这些药物治疗的癌症患者进行监测。