Sohn Il Suk, Kim Chong-Jin, Ahn Taehoon, Youn Ho-Joong, Jeon Hui-Kyung, Ihm Sang Hyun, Cho Eun Joo, Chung Woo-Baek, Chae Shung Chull, Kim Woo-Shik, Nam Chang-Wook, Park Seong-Mi, Choi Ji-Yong, Kim Young-Kwon, Hong Taek-Jong, Lee Hae-Young, Cho Jang-Hyun, Shin Eun-Seok, Yoon Jung-Han, Yang Tae-Hyun, Jeong Myung-Ho, Lee Jun-Hee, Park Joong-Il
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1628-1638. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering is important for the treatment of hypertension; however, it has been a challenge to achieve target BP in many patients. The purpose of this study was to explore the optimal dosage of a fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil (CAN) and amlodipine besylate (AML), by examining the tolerability and efficacy of CAN/AML combination therapy compared with those of monotherapy with either drug in patients with essential hypertension.
This Phase II multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial enrolled patients aged 19 years or older with essential hypertension, defined as a mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) between 95 and 115 mm Hg, and a mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) of <200 mm Hg after a 2-week placebo run-in period. A total of 635 patients were screened, of whom 439 were randomized to receive treatment; 425 patients were included in the full analysis set (combination therapy, 212; monotherapy, 213). Participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 8 treatments: CAN (8 or 16 mg), AML (5 or 10 mg), CAN/AML (8 mg/5 mg, 8 mg/10 mg, 16 mg/5 mg, or 16 mg/10 mg), once daily for 8 weeks.
After 8 weeks of treatment, changes in msDBP were significantly greater in the groups receiving CAN/AML combination therapies compared with monotherapies at matched doses, with the exception of CAN 8 mg/AML 10 mg versus AML 10 mg. The response to treatment and the achievement of target BP (both msSBP and msDBP) at week 8 were significantly greater overall in the groups that received combination therapy versus monotherapy. All medications were relatively well tolerated in each group.
Eight-week administration of CAN/AML (8 mg/5 mg, 16 mg/5 mg, and 16 mg/10 mg) resulted in a significantly greater BP reduction than that with CAN or AML monotherapy, and was determined to be well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02944734.
强化降压对高血压治疗很重要;然而,让许多患者达到目标血压一直是一项挑战。本研究的目的是通过比较坎地沙坦酯(CAN)和苯磺酸氨氯地平(AML)固定剂量联合治疗与单用其中任一药物治疗原发性高血压患者的耐受性和疗效,探索CAN/AML固定剂量联合治疗的最佳剂量。
这项II期多中心、随机、双盲临床试验纳入了年龄在19岁及以上的原发性高血压患者,定义为在为期2周的安慰剂导入期后,平均坐位舒张压(msDBP)在95至115mmHg之间,平均坐位收缩压(msSBP)<200mmHg。共筛选了635例患者,其中439例随机接受治疗;425例患者纳入全分析集(联合治疗组212例,单药治疗组213例)。参与者被随机分配接受8种治疗中的1种:CAN(8或16mg)、AML(5或10mg)、CAN/AML(8mg/5mg、8mg/10mg、16mg/5mg或16mg/10mg),每日1次,共8周。
治疗8周后,与匹配剂量的单药治疗相比,接受CAN/AML联合治疗的组中msDBP的变化显著更大,但CAN 8mg/AML 10mg组与AML 10mg组除外。总体而言,在第8周时,接受联合治疗的组对治疗的反应和达到目标血压(msSBP和msDBP)的情况均显著优于单药治疗组。每组中所有药物的耐受性相对良好。
CAN/AML(8mg/5mg、16mg/5mg和16mg/10mg)治疗8周导致的血压降低显著大于CAN或AML单药治疗,且耐受性良好。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02944734。