University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, 115 S. Grand Ave, S515 PHAR, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Towncrest Pharmacy, 2306 Muscatine Ave. #100, Iowa City, IA 52240, United States.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jun;14(6):589-594. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
Medication nonadherence is a significant public health problem. Community pharmacists are positioned to intervene, however, the process is not well understood.
To classify and quantify the reasons for nonadherence documented by community pharmacists.
A retrospective content analysis of pharmacist notes related to nonadherence at a service oriented community pharmacy in the Midwest United States. Notes from the site's dispensing custom documentation software were obtained from September 1, 2014 through February 28, 2015 that were labeled "compliance", either prompted by proportion of days covered calculations or entered as a drug therapy problem. A code list was iterated for the notes based on the literature and by reading the notes and generating descriptive codes. A reliability analysis was calculated for two coders. Notes were coded, check-coded, and discrepancies were resolved using a consensus process. Frequencies were calculated for each code and representative text was selected.
Pharmacists documented 3491 notes as part of their continuous medication monitoring process. Nineteen codes were developed. The reliability for the coders had a Cohen's Kappa of 0.749. The majority of notes (61.4%) documented the pharmacist evaluated the refill and had no concerns or would continue to follow. Also documented were specific reasons for out of range PDCs not indicative of a nonadherence problem. Only 2.2% of notes specifically documented a nonadherence problem, such as forgetfulness or cost.
While pharmacists encountered many false positive nonadherence alerts, following up with patients led to hundreds of discussions and clarifications about how patients use their medications at home. These results suggest a small minority of late refills are judged by pharmacists as indicative of an adherence problem, contrary to the prevailing literature. Pharmacists may benefit from modifying their approach to nonadherence interviewing and documentation as they seek to address nonadherence in practice.
This study descriptively coded community pharmacist notes related to medication nonadherence. Most notes were prompted by automatic calculations by the documentation software of the proportion of days covered. This prompted regular conversations about non-adherence issues and clarifications on how medications are being used at home. Documentation suggested most adherence problems were technical in nature rather than stemming from patient factors like medication beliefs. Pharmacists could be more intentional and descriptive when documenting nonadherence issues so that more targeted follow up can be made, including a greater investigation of medication beliefs.
药物依从性是一个重大的公共卫生问题。社区药剂师具备干预的条件,然而,这一过程尚未被充分理解。
对社区药剂师记录的药物不依从原因进行分类和量化。
对美国中西部一家以服务为导向的社区药房的配药定制文档软件中与不依从相关的药剂师记录进行回顾性内容分析。从 2014 年 9 月 1 日至 2015 年 2 月 28 日,获取软件中标记为“合规性”的记录,这些记录是通过比例天数覆盖计算提示的,或者作为药物治疗问题输入的。根据文献和阅读记录生成描述性代码,为记录迭代了一份代码清单。两名编码员进行了可靠性分析。对记录进行编码、核对编码,通过共识过程解决差异。为每个代码计算频率,并选择有代表性的文本。
药剂师在连续药物监测过程中记录了 3491 份记录。制定了 19 个代码。编码员的可靠性具有 Cohen's Kappa 值为 0.749。大多数记录(61.4%)记录了药剂师评估了续方,没有发现问题或会继续关注。还记录了特定的超出 PDC 范围的原因,但并不表明存在不依从问题,例如健忘或费用问题。只有 2.2%的记录明确记录了不依从问题,例如健忘或费用问题。
虽然药剂师遇到了许多假阳性的不依从警报,但与患者跟进导致了数百次关于患者在家中使用药物的讨论和澄清。这些结果表明,少数延迟续方被药剂师判断为提示依从性问题,与普遍存在的文献相反。药剂师在实践中解决不依从问题时,可能需要修改他们的不依从访谈和记录方法。
本研究对与药物不依从相关的社区药剂师记录进行了描述性编码。大多数记录是由文档软件自动计算比例天数覆盖范围提示的。这促使药剂师经常就不依从问题进行对话,并澄清药物在家中使用的情况。记录表明,大多数依从性问题是技术性的,而不是源于患者因素,如药物信念。药剂师在记录不依从问题时可以更加有针对性和描述性,以便进行更有针对性的后续跟进,包括对药物信念进行更深入的调查。