Suppr超能文献

灵性与缓和医疗研究的科学现状第二部分:筛查、评估和干预。

State of the Science of Spirituality and Palliative Care Research Part II: Screening, Assessment, and Interventions.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Harvard Medical Department of Religion, Health and Human Values, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):441-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Abstract

The State of the Science in Spirituality and Palliative Care was convened to address the current landscape of research at the intersection of spirituality and palliative care and to identify critical next steps to advance this field of inquiry. Part II of the SOS-SPC report addresses the state of extant research and identifies critical research priorities pertaining to the following questions: 1) How do we assess spirituality? 2) How do we intervene on spirituality in palliative care? And 3) How do we train health professionals to address spirituality in palliative care? Findings from this report point to the need for screening and assessment tools that are rigorously developed, clinically relevant, and adapted to a diversity of clinical and cultural settings. Chaplaincy research is needed to form professional spiritual care provision in a variety of settings, and outcomes assessed to ascertain impact on key patient, family, and clinical staff outcomes. Intervention research requires rigorous conceptualization and assessments. Intervention development must be attentive to clinical feasibility, incorporate perspectives and needs of patients, families, and clinicians, and be targeted to diverse populations with spiritual needs. Finally, spiritual care competencies for various clinical care team members should be refined. Reflecting those competencies, training curricula and evaluation tools should be developed, and the impact of education on patient, family, and clinician outcomes should be systematically assessed.

摘要

该研究召集了一批精通英文和简体中文的专业翻译,旨在探讨精神与姑息治疗交叉领域的研究现状,并确定推动该研究领域发展的关键步骤。SOS-SPC 报告的第二部分探讨了现有研究的状况,并确定了与以下问题相关的关键研究重点:1)我们如何评估灵性?2)我们如何在姑息治疗中干预灵性?3)我们如何培训医疗保健专业人员来解决姑息治疗中的灵性问题?该报告的调查结果表明,需要开发严格、临床相关且适用于多种临床和文化环境的筛查和评估工具。牧师研究对于在各种环境中形成专业的精神关怀服务至关重要,并且需要评估结果,以确定其对关键患者、家庭和临床工作人员的影响。干预研究需要严格的概念化和评估。干预措施的制定必须考虑到临床可行性,融入患者、家庭和临床医生的观点和需求,并针对具有精神需求的不同人群进行有针对性的干预。最后,应完善针对各种临床护理团队成员的精神关怀能力。反映这些能力,应开发培训课程和评估工具,并系统评估教育对患者、家庭和临床医生的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验