St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1578-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.031. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
This study sought to determine if indexed effective orifice area (EOAi), using left ventricular outflow tract measured from computed tomography (EOAi), reclassified prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) compared with conventional echocardiogram-defined measurements (EOAi).
PPM does not predict mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, it is unknown if the EOAi of the left ventricular outflow tract improves risk stratification.
A total of 765 TAVR patients from the PARTNER II (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves II) trial S3i cohort were evaluated. EOAi was calculated using the continuity equation, and the left ventricular outflow tract area was derived from baseline computed tomography. Traditional echocardiographic categories defined PPM: absent (>0.85 cm/m), moderate (≥0.65 and ≤0.85 cm/m), or severe (≤0.65 cm/m). Correlation of EOAi and EOAi to 1-year outcomes was performed.
The incidence of PPM was 24% with EOA compared with 45% with EOAi. Only 6% of PPM was graded severe by EOAi compared with 9% by EOAi. EOAi, but not EOAi, defined PPM showed association with reduced left ventricular mass regression (p = 0.03 vs. p = 0.52). There was no association between PPM and death or rehospitalization at 1 year with either modality. EOA was associated with minor stroke at 1 year (log-rank p = 0.04), and EOAi with stroke/transient ischemic attack (log-rank p = 0.030). Furthermore, when subjects with mild or greater paravalvular regurgitation were excluded, the presence of PPM did not show association with any outcome.
EOAi downgrades frequency and severity of PPM in patients after TAVR, and was not associated with mortality 1 year after TAVR. EOAi, but not EOAi, was associated with less left ventricular mass regression.
本研究旨在确定使用计算机断层扫描(CT)测量的左心室流出道指数有效开口面积(EOAi)与传统超声心动图定义的测量值(EOAi)相比,能否重新分类瓣周漏(PPM)。
PPM 不能预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的死亡率。但是,目前尚不清楚左心室流出道的 EOAi 是否可以改善风险分层。
共有 765 名来自 PARTNER II (经导管主动脉瓣置换术 II 期)试验 S3i 队列的 TAVR 患者接受了评估。使用连续方程计算 EOAi,左心室流出道面积由基线 CT 获得。传统超声心动图分类定义 PPM:无(>0.85cm/m)、中度(≥0.65 和≤0.85cm/m)或重度(≤0.65cm/m)。分析了 EOAi 和 EOAi 与 1 年结果的相关性。
与 EOA 相比,EOAi 诊断的 PPM 发生率为 24%,而 EOAi 为 45%。只有 6%的 PPM 患者的 EOAi 为重度,而 EOAi 为 9%。EOAi 而非 EOAi 定义的 PPM 与左心室质量回归减少相关(p=0.03 与 p=0.52)。两种方法均未发现 PPM 与 1 年死亡或再住院之间存在相关性。EOA 与 1 年时的轻度卒中有关(对数秩检验 p=0.04),EOAi 与卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作有关(对数秩检验 p=0.030)。此外,当排除有轻度或更严重瓣周漏的患者后,PPM 的存在与任何结果均无相关性。
EOAi 降低了 TAVR 后患者 PPM 的发生率和严重程度,与 TAVR 后 1 年的死亡率无关。EOAi 而非 EOAi 与左心室质量回归减少有关。