Suppr超能文献

社会情感行为筛查:两个工具、两个信息来源的比较

Social, emotional, and behavioral screening: A comparison of two measures and two methods across informants.

机构信息

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States.

出版信息

J Sch Psychol. 2017 Oct;64:93-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

Abstract

The current study is a correlational design comparing a multiple-gate social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) screening system with a single-gate SEB screening system using a common criterion variable. Teachers and parents of 105 preschool students completed the multiple-gate Preschool Behavior Screening System (PBSS; Feeney-Kettler, Kratochwill, & Kettler, 2009) and the single-gate Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS; Kamphaus & Reynolds, 2007). The measures were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlations with each other, and conditional probability indices to represent accuracy in predicting scores from the Achenbach System for Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000). Results indicated the PBSS was internally consistent (α=0.87 to 0.97), teacher-parent agreement for both measures was in the expected range (r=0.05 to 0.40), and relations among scores from the measures were at the expected magnitudes and in the expected directions. Although both measures accurately predicted ASEBA results, the BESS was a better predictor for both groups of raters (i.e., teachers and parents) in most situations. The PBSS provided the advantage of also being a good predictor while providing internally consistent subscale scores that may be useful for intervention planning. The results are discussed including their implications for school psychologists seeking to select technically sound instruments that yield reliable scores from which valid inferences about SEB factors can be drawn.

摘要

本研究采用相关设计,将多门社会情感行为(SEB)筛查系统与使用共同标准变量的单门 SEB 筛查系统进行比较。105 名学前儿童的教师和家长完成了多门学前行为筛查系统(PBSS;Feeney-Kettler、Kratochwill 和 Kettler,2009)和单门行为和情绪筛查系统(BESS;Kamphaus 和 Reynolds,2007)。使用 Cronbach's alpha、彼此之间的 Pearson 相关系数以及条件概率指数来评估这些措施,以代表从基于实证评估的 Achenbach 系统(ASEBA;Achenbach 和 Rescorla,2000)预测分数的准确性。结果表明,PBSS 具有内部一致性(α=0.87 至 0.97),两种措施的教师-家长一致性均在预期范围内(r=0.05 至 0.40),并且措施之间的分数关系在预期的大小和方向上。虽然两种措施都准确地预测了 ASEBA 的结果,但在大多数情况下,BESS 是两种评分者(即教师和家长)的更好预测者。PBSS 提供了优势,同时提供了内部一致的子量表分数,这可能对干预计划有用。讨论了结果,包括它们对希望选择技术上合理的工具的学校心理学家的影响,这些工具可以从 SEB 因素中得出可靠的分数,并进行有效的推断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验