Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Nijmegen.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;56(8):659-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
The objectives of this study were to model more homogeneous subgroups within autism spectrum disorder (ASD) based on early trajectories of core symptoms; and to further characterize these subgroups in terms of trajectories of language, cognition, co-occurring (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]-related) traits and clinical outcome diagnosis.
Children (N = 203) referred for possible ASD at ages 1 to 4 years were assessed at three time points at intervals ranging from 9 months to 3 years. Assessments included standardized measures for ASD (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [ADOS]), language (ADOS-language item), nonverbal IQ (NV-IQ; different tests adequate to chronological/mental age), and parent-reported behavioral problems (Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment, Child Behavior Checklist).
Latent-class growth curve analysis with ADOS total scores led to the identification of three main stable and two small improving groups: a severe-stable group (19.5% of sample)-the only group without considerable language improvement-showed persistent low NV-IQ and marked increase in attention problems over time; a moderate-stable group (21.7%) with below-average increasing NV-IQ; and a mild-stable group (48%) with stable-average NV-IQ and the highest scores on ADHD-related traits, whose ASD outcome diagnoses increased despite stable-low ASD scores. Two groups (each 5.4%) improved: one moved from severe to moderate ASD scores, and the other moved from moderate to mild/nonspectrum scores. Both of these groups improved on language, NV-IQ, and ADHD-related traits.
Results support the high stability of ASD symptoms into various severity levels, but also highlight the significant contribution of non-ASD domains in defining and explaining the different ASD trajectories.
本研究的目的是基于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)核心症状的早期轨迹,为 ASD 建立更同质的亚组;并进一步根据语言、认知、共病(与注意缺陷多动障碍[ADHD]相关的)特征和临床结局诊断的轨迹来描述这些亚组。
203 名 1 至 4 岁被转诊为可能患有 ASD 的儿童在 9 个月至 3 年的时间间隔内进行了三次评估。评估包括 ASD 的标准化量表(孤独症诊断观察量表[ADOS])、语言(ADOS-语言项目)、非语言智商(NV-IQ;适合年龄/心理年龄的不同测试)和家长报告的行为问题(婴儿-幼儿社会情感评估,儿童行为检查表)。
ADOS 总分的潜在类别增长曲线分析确定了三个主要的稳定组和两个较小的改善组:严重稳定组(占样本的 19.5%)是唯一没有语言显著改善的组,持续表现出较低的 NV-IQ 和注意力问题随时间的增加;中度稳定组(21.7%)的 NV-IQ 呈增长趋势,但低于平均水平;轻度稳定组(48%)的 NV-IQ 稳定且处于平均水平,ADHD 相关特征的得分最高,尽管 ASD 评分保持较低,但 ASD 的诊断结果增加。两个组(各占 5.4%)得到改善:一个从严重到中度 ASD 评分,另一个从中度到轻度/非谱系评分。这两个组在语言、NV-IQ 和 ADHD 相关特征方面都有改善。
结果支持 ASD 症状在不同严重程度上具有较高的稳定性,但也强调了非 ASD 领域在定义和解释不同 ASD 轨迹方面的重要贡献。