• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰农场使用风险评估文件后的健康与安全状况

Health and Safety Adoption from Use of a Risk Assessment Document on Irish Farms.

作者信息

McNamara John, Griffin Patrick, Kinsella James, Phelan James

机构信息

a Teagasc - Agriculture and Food Development Authority , Ireland.

b School of Agriculture and Food Science , University College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland.

出版信息

J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):384-394. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1356779.

DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2017.1356779
PMID:28742437
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article describes levels of implementation of occupational health and safety (OHS) controls on a sample of Irish farms following completion of a risk assessment document (RAD) made available as part of a statutory code of practice (COP) for the agriculture sector. The article describes the legislation mandating the COP and the operation of a prevention initiative (PI) among key stakeholders to develop and promote farmer use of the COP and RAD.

METHODS

RADs were collected for farmers (N = 475) and the number and type of OHS controls listed for action were tabulated. A farm audit of OHS standards and of implementation of controls listed for action in the RAD was undertaken among a randomly selected sample of farms (N = 94) where the RAD was completed.

RESULTS

The study data indicates that farmers used the RAD to a limited extent, and that their focus in its use was on identifying physical rather than organizational controls. An association was found between farmers who actively implemented controls and positive OHS standards. Farm OHS standards were also associated with farmer attitude to OHS, farm enterprise, farmer age category, and work time needed to operate the farm.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the study data suggests that standards of farm management are a crucial determinant of OHS standards. The study data also indicates that having knowledge of required OHS controls does not ensure implementation. Development of social learning in groups is considered as a significant means of increasing OHS farm adoption.

摘要

目标

本文描述了在完成作为农业部门法定操作规范(COP)一部分提供的风险评估文件(RAD)之后,爱尔兰农场样本中职业健康与安全(OHS)控制措施的实施水平。本文介绍了强制实施该COP的立法以及关键利益相关者之间预防倡议(PI)的运作情况,以制定和促进农民使用COP和RAD。

方法

收集了农民(N = 475)的RAD,并将列出要采取行动的OHS控制措施的数量和类型制成表格。在随机抽取的已完成RAD的农场样本(N = 94)中,对OHS标准以及RAD中列出要采取行动的控制措施的实施情况进行了农场审计。

结果

研究数据表明,农民对RAD的使用程度有限,并且他们在使用RAD时侧重于识别物理控制而非组织控制。发现积极实施控制措施的农民与良好的OHS标准之间存在关联。农场OHS标准还与农民对OHS的态度、农场企业类型、农民年龄类别以及经营农场所需的工作时间有关。

结论

总体而言,研究数据表明农场管理标准是OHS标准的关键决定因素。研究数据还表明,了解所需的OHS控制措施并不能确保其得到实施。群体社会学习的发展被认为是提高农场采用OHS的重要手段。

相似文献

1
Health and Safety Adoption from Use of a Risk Assessment Document on Irish Farms.爱尔兰农场使用风险评估文件后的健康与安全状况
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):384-394. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1356779.
2
Telling Tales: Using Vignettes to Overcome Optimism Bias in Farm Health and Safety Attitudinal Studies.说故事:利用短篇故事克服农场健康和安全态度研究中的乐观偏见。
J Agromedicine. 2024 Oct;29(4):531-546. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2365638. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
3
Safer tomorrow: Irish dairy farmers' self-perception of their farm safety practices.更安全的明天:爱尔兰奶农对其农场安全实践的自我认知。
J Safety Res. 2022 Sep;82:450-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Symbolic Interactionism: A Framework for Understanding Risk-Taking Behaviors in Farm Communities.象征互动理论:理解农场社区冒险行为的一个框架。
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(1):26-35. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1248306.
5
Farm Safety Practices and Farm Size in New South Wales.新南威尔士州的农场安全实践与农场规模
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(3):229-234. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1318101.
6
Educational intervention among farmers in a community health care setting.社区卫生保健环境中对农民的教育干预。
Occup Med (Lond). 2012 Sep;62(6):458-61. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqs129. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
7
Assessing the impact of tailored biosecurity advice on farmer behaviour and pathogen presence in beef herds in England and Wales.评估定制的生物安全建议对英格兰和威尔士肉牛群中养殖户行为及病原体存在情况的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Dec 1;135:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.018. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Counting Farm Injuries and Fatalities: An Assessment of Irish Occupational Health and Safety Surveillance Data Systems.计算农场伤害和死亡人数:对爱尔兰职业健康和安全监测数据系统的评估。
J Agromedicine. 2024 Apr;29(2):289-296. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2317862. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
9
A socio-cognitive strategy to address farmers' tolerance of high risk work: Disrupting the effects of apprenticeship of observation.一种应对农民对高风险工作耐受性的社会认知策略:打破观察性学徒制的影响。
J Safety Res. 2017 Feb;60:113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
10
Barriers and facilitators to adopting safe farm-machine related behaviors: A focus group study exploring older farmers' perspectives.采用安全农机相关行为的障碍和促进因素:探索老年农民观点的焦点小组研究。
J Safety Res. 2024 Sep;90:19-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Deconstruction of farm machine-related safety interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.农业机械相关安全干预措施的解构:一项系统综述与叙述性综合分析
Ann Work Expo Health. 2025 Mar 15;69(3):233-250. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae105.
2
Occupational health and safety among farmers: a comprehensive study in Central Anatolia, Turkey.农民职业健康与安全:土耳其安纳托利亚中部的综合研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):2732. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20249-7.
3
Legal and regulatory instruments for NCD prevention: a scoping review and descriptive analysis of evaluations in OECD countries.
用于非传染性疾病预防的法律和监管工具:经合组织国家评估的范围审查和描述性分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18053-4.
4
Promoting childhood farm safety in Ireland.促进爱尔兰儿童农场安全。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;10:1055082. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1055082. eCollection 2022.