From the Department of Neuroradiology (P.E., J.S.K., C.Z., I.R.).
Department of Neurology (M.-M.H., M.M.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):1941-1945. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5329. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
The double inversion recovery sequence is known to be very sensitive and specific for MS-related lesions. Our aim was to compare the sensitivity of pre- and postcontrast images of 3D double inversion recovery and conventional 3D T1-weighted images for the detection of contrast-enhancing MS-related lesions in the brain to analyze whether double inversion recovery could be as effective as T1WI.
A postcontrast 3D double inversion recovery sequence was acquired in addition to the standard MR imaging protocol at 3T, including pre- and postcontrast 3D T1WI sequences as well as precontrast double inversion recovery of 45 consecutive patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome between June and December 2013. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed precontrast, postcontrast, and subtraction images of double inversion recovery as well as T1WI to count the number of contrast-enhancing lesions. Afterward, a consensus reading was performed. Lin concordance was calculated between both radiologists, and differences in lesion detectability were assessed with the Student test. Additionally, the contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated.
Significantly more contrast-enhancing lesions could be detected with double inversion recovery compared with T1WI (16%, 214 versus 185, = .007). The concordance between both radiologists was almost perfect (ρ = 0.94 for T1WI and ρ = 0.98 for double inversion recovery, respectively). The contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher in double inversion recovery subtraction images compared with T1-weighted subtraction images (double inversion recovery, 14.3 ± 5.5; T1WI, 6.3 ± 7.1; < .001).
Pre- and postcontrast double inversion recovery enables better detection of contrast-enhancing lesions in MS in the brain compared with T1WI and may be considered an alternative to the standard MR imaging protocol.
双反转恢复序列对 MS 相关病变具有很高的敏感性和特异性。我们的目的是比较三维双反转恢复和常规三维 T1 加权成像的预对比和后对比图像对脑内增强型 MS 相关病变的检测灵敏度,以分析双反转恢复序列是否可以与 T1WI 一样有效。
在 3T 磁共振成像仪上除了标准磁共振成像方案外,还额外获取增强后 3D 双反转恢复序列,包括预对比和后对比 3D T1WI 序列,以及 2013 年 6 月至 12 月间 45 例 MS 或临床孤立综合征患者的预对比 45 例双反转恢复序列。两位神经放射科医生独立评估双反转恢复序列的预对比、后对比和减影图像以及 T1WI,以计数增强病变的数量。然后进行共识阅读。计算两位放射科医生之间的 Lin 一致性,并用 Student 检验评估病变检出率的差异。此外,还计算了对比噪声比。
与 T1WI 相比,双反转恢复序列可检测到更多的增强病变(16%,214 个 vs. 185 个, =.007)。两位放射科医生之间的一致性几乎为完美(T1WI 为 ρ = 0.94,双反转恢复序列为 ρ = 0.98)。与 T1 加权减影图像相比,双反转恢复减影图像的对比噪声比显著更高(双反转恢复,14.3 ± 5.5;T1WI,6.3 ± 7.1; <.001)。
与 T1WI 相比,预对比和后对比双反转恢复可更好地检测脑内 MS 的增强病变,可作为标准磁共振成像方案的替代方案。