Department of Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah Medical Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2017 Nov;30(11):1561-1566. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.65. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) recommendations for HER2 testing contain a recommendation for pathologists with respect to invasive micropapillary carcinoma. The guidelines suggest that HER2 immunohistochemical staining that is intense but incomplete and would be considered 1+ may actually be HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Thus, pathologists should consider reporting the immunohistochemistry as equivocal (2+) and employ an alternative testing methodology. This recommendation is based largely on one paper wherein the authors tested a series of 22 micropapillary carcinomas that were considered 1+ by immunohistochemistry and identified HER2 amplification in one case (5%). In order to assess for a possible discordance between HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, we evaluated a series of invasive carcinomas with micropapillary features using both methodologies. As described by the WHO, invasive carcinomas with micropapillary features have small, hollow, or morula-like clusters of cells surrounded by clear stromal spaces. All cases had HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization performed, and for cases with equivocal fluorescence in situ hybridization results, an alternative Chromosome 17 probe (RAI1) was employed. All assays were scored according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines. Specifically for this study, immunohistochemistry was scored irrespective of the presence of micropapillary features. Overall, we identified HER2 amplification in 21 (47%) of the cases assayed, with the corresponding immunohistochemistry being 1+ (n=9), 2+ (n=11), and 3+ (n=1). The ASCO/CAP recommendation that this morphology may deviate from the typical staining pattern is highlighted, as we found that 43% of cases with micropapillary features and HER2 staining that would otherwise be scored as 1+ were HER2-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. This study supports the ASCO/CAP recommendation that pathologists should consider reporting immunohistochemistry in this morphology as equivocal and perform reflex testing using in situ hybridization.
2013 年美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家协会(ASCO/CAP)HER2 检测建议包含了对浸润性微乳头状癌病理学家的建议。指南建议,HER2 免疫组化染色强度高但不完整,被认为是 1+,实际上可能通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测到 HER2 扩增。因此,病理学家应考虑将免疫组化报告为不确定(2+),并采用替代检测方法。这一建议主要基于一篇论文,该论文作者对 22 例经免疫组化检测为 1+的微乳头状癌进行了检测,其中 1 例(5%)存在 HER2 扩增。为了评估 HER2 免疫组化与 FISH 之间可能存在的不相符,我们使用这两种方法评估了一系列具有微乳头状特征的浸润性癌。如世界卫生组织(WHO)所述,具有微乳头状特征的浸润性癌具有小的、空的或类似于桑葚样的细胞簇,周围环绕着透明的间质空间。所有病例均进行了 HER2 免疫组化和 FISH 检测,对于 FISH 检测结果不确定的病例,采用了替代的 17 号染色体探针(RAI1)。所有检测均根据 2013 年 ASCO/CAP 指南进行评分。具体到本研究,免疫组化评分不考虑微乳头状特征的存在。总的来说,我们在检测的 21 例(47%)病例中发现了 HER2 扩增,相应的免疫组化结果为 1+(n=9)、2+(n=11)和 3+(n=1)。该研究强调了 ASCO/CAP 提出的这种形态可能与典型染色模式不符的建议,因为我们发现,43%的具有微乳头状特征和 HER2 染色的病例,如果按照 1+评分,通过 FISH 检测会被判定为 HER2 扩增。本研究支持 ASCO/CAP 的建议,即病理学家应考虑将这种形态的免疫组化报告为不确定,并采用 FISH 进行反射性检测。