• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅存在盆腔或腹膜后淋巴结转移的临床证据的膀胱癌患者,化疗后淋巴结清扫术无效:基于倾向评分的分析。

Lack of Effectiveness of Postchemotherapy Lymphadenectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients with Clinical Evidence of Metastatic Pelvic or Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes Only: A Propensity Score-based Analysis.

机构信息

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.006
PMID:28753897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5712487/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data is available on the role, and extent of, postchemotherapy lymphadenectomy (PC-LND) in patients with clinical evidence of pelvic (cN1-3) or retroperitoneal (RP) lymph node spread from urothelial bladder carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of operated versus nonoperated patients after first-line chemotherapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 34 centers was collected, totaling 522 patients, treated between January 2000 and June 2015. Criteria for patient selection were the following: bladder primary tumor, lymph node metastases (pelvic±RP) only, first-line platinum-based chemotherapy given.

INTERVENTION

LND (with cystectomy) versus observation after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Multiple propensity score techniques were adopted, including 1:1 propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Additionally, the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed with the inclusion of the covariates, that is, with doubly robust estimation.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 242 (46.4%) patients received PC-LND and 280 (53.6%) observation after chemotherapy. There were 177 (33.9%) and 345 (66.1%) patients with either RP or pelvic LND only, respectively. Doubly robust estimation-adjusted comparison was not significant for improved OS for PC-LND (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-1.31, p=0.479), confirmed by matched analysis (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.60-1.36, p=0.628). This was also observed in the RP subgroup (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.68-1.84). The retrospective nature of the data and the heterogeneous patient population were the major limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were substantial differences between the two groups, after accounting for major confounders we report a nonsignificant OS difference with PC-LND compared with observation only. These findings may be hypothesis-generating for future prospective trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We found no differences in survival by adding postchemotherapy lymphadenectomy in patients with pelvic or retroperitoneal lymph node metastatic bladder cancer. The indication to perform postchemotherapy lymphadenectomy in the most suitable patients requires additional studies.

摘要

背景

在有盆腔(cN1-3)或腹膜后(RP)淋巴结转移的临床证据的尿路上皮膀胱癌患者中,化疗后淋巴结切除术(PC-LND)的作用和范围的数据有限。

目的

比较一线化疗后手术与非手术患者的结局。

设计、地点和参与者:收集了 34 个中心的数据,共 522 名患者,他们于 2000 年 1 月至 2015 年 6 月接受治疗。患者选择标准如下:膀胱原发性肿瘤,仅淋巴结转移(盆腔±RP),一线铂类化疗。

干预措施

转移性尿路上皮膀胱癌一线化疗后行 LND(伴膀胱切除术)或观察。

结局测量和统计分析

总生存(OS)是主要终点。采用了多种倾向评分技术,包括 1:1 倾向评分匹配和治疗反概率加权。此外,还进行了治疗反概率加权分析,并纳入了协变量,即双重稳健估计。

结果和局限性

总体而言,242 名(46.4%)患者接受了 PC-LND,280 名(53.6%)患者在化疗后接受了观察。分别有 177 名(33.9%)和 345 名(66.1%)患者仅行 RP 或盆腔 LND。经双重稳健估计校正后的 OS 比较显示,PC-LND 并未显著改善(风险比[HR]:0.86,95%置信区间[CI]:0.56-1.31,p=0.479),匹配分析结果也证实了这一点(HR:0.91,95%CI:0.60-1.36,p=0.628)。在 RP 亚组也观察到同样的结果(HR:1.12,95%CI:0.68-1.84)。数据的回顾性和患者人群的异质性是主要的局限性。

结论

尽管两组之间存在显著差异,但在考虑了主要混杂因素后,我们报告 PC-LND 与单纯观察相比,OS 无显著差异。这些发现可能为未来的前瞻性试验提供假设。

患者总结

我们发现,在盆腔或腹膜后淋巴结转移性膀胱癌患者中,化疗后行淋巴结切除术并不能提高生存率。在最合适的患者中进行化疗后淋巴结切除术的适应证还需要进一步的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c394/5712487/68a0b1599bbe/nihms901371f2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c394/5712487/21ae8832debd/nihms901371f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c394/5712487/68a0b1599bbe/nihms901371f2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c394/5712487/21ae8832debd/nihms901371f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c394/5712487/68a0b1599bbe/nihms901371f2a.jpg

相似文献

1
Lack of Effectiveness of Postchemotherapy Lymphadenectomy in Bladder Cancer Patients with Clinical Evidence of Metastatic Pelvic or Retroperitoneal Lymph Nodes Only: A Propensity Score-based Analysis.仅存在盆腔或腹膜后淋巴结转移的临床证据的膀胱癌患者,化疗后淋巴结清扫术无效:基于倾向评分的分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
2
Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node-Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score-Weighted Competing Risks Analysis.根治性膀胱切除术治疗局部晚期和/或盆腔淋巴结阳性的肌层浸润性膀胱癌辅助化疗的疗效:倾向评分加权竞争风险分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Mar;4(2):252-259. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Extended Versus Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: Survival Results from a Prospective, Randomized Trial.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的广泛淋巴结清扫与局限性淋巴结清扫的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验的生存结果。
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):604-611. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.047. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
4
Predictors of adequate lymph node dissection in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and effect on survival.在接受根治性膀胱切除术的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者中,预测淋巴结清扫充分的因素及其对生存的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(10):796.e7-796.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 20.
5
Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.根治性膀胱切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:仅接受手术治疗的髂总血管分叉以上淋巴结转移患者的生存率。
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.160. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
6
Lymph node density for patient counselling about prognosis and for designing clinical trials of adjuvant therapies after radical cystectomy.淋巴结密度可用于患者预后咨询,并为根治性膀胱切除术后辅助治疗的临床试验设计提供依据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E590-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11325.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Lymph node yield in node-negative patients predicts cancer specific survival following radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma.淋巴结产量在淋巴结阴性患者中预测了根治性膀胱切除术治疗移行细胞癌后的癌症特异性生存。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Nov;58(6):416-422. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.6.416. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
8
Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.根治性膀胱切除术联合盆腔淋巴结整块清扫术后盆腔淋巴结转移患者的危险因素:淋巴结密度概念
J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000072422.69286.0e.
9
Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer: outcome in 83 patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.膀胱癌盆腔淋巴结转移:83例患者根治性膀胱切除及盆腔淋巴结清扫后的结局
J Urol. 2001 Jul;166(1):19-23.
10
Potential Benefit of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌行淋巴结清扫术的潜在获益:欧洲泌尿外科学会非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌指南专家组的系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):224-241. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Is There a Role for Surgery in the Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma?手术在转移性尿路上皮癌治疗中是否有作用?
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 10;13(24):7498. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247498.
2
The role of radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy in the management of bladder cancer with clinically positive lymph node involvement.根治性膀胱切除术及淋巴结清扫术在伴有临床阳性淋巴结受累的膀胱癌治疗中的作用。
Curr Opin Urol. 2025 Jan 1;35(1):115-122. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001230. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Avelumab maintenance therapy for node-positive muscle invasive bladder cancer: a report of two cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathological downstaging and survival after induction chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for clinically node-positive bladder cancer-Results of a nationwide population-based study.诱导化疗联合根治性膀胱切除术后临床淋巴结阳性膀胱癌的病理降期及生存情况——一项基于全国人群的研究结果
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Dec;69:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
2
Nomogram-based Prediction of Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy: Retrospective International Study of Invasive/Advanced Cancer of the Urothelium (RISC).基于列线图预测接受一线铂类化疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者的总生存期:尿路上皮浸润性/晚期癌的回顾性国际研究(RISC)
Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):281-289. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
3
阿维鲁单抗维持治疗淋巴结阳性的肌层浸润性膀胱癌:两例报告
Front Oncol. 2024 May 28;14:1397738. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397738. eCollection 2024.
4
Management of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with clinical evidence of pelvic lymph node metastases.有盆腔淋巴结转移临床证据的肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的管理。
Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Jun;21(6):339-356. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00842-y. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
5
Management of Bladder Cancer Patients with Clinical Evidence of Lymph Node Invasion (cN+).有淋巴结转移临床证据(cN+)的膀胱癌患者的管理
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;14(21):5286. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215286.
6
A Case of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With Pelvic Lymph Node Involvement Treated With Pembrolizumab and Subsequent Radical Cystectomy and Maintained No Evidence of Disease After Surgery.一例伴有盆腔淋巴结转移的肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者,接受帕博利珠单抗治疗后行根治性膀胱切除术,术后无疾病证据。
Cureus. 2021 Nov 8;13(11):e19375. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19375. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Inguinal lymph node metastasis of bladder carcinoma after radical cystectomy: A case report and review of literature.根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌腹股沟淋巴结转移:一例报告并文献复习
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;75:385-389. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.09.068. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies for Bladder Cancer With Clinical Evidence of Regional Lymph Node Involvement.有区域淋巴结受累临床证据的膀胱癌治疗策略的比较有效性
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;34(22):2627-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.5033. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
4
A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Outcomes of Patients with Clinically Node Positive Urothelial Bladder Cancer Treated with Induction Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy.对接受诱导化疗和根治性膀胱切除术治疗的临床淋巴结阳性尿路上皮膀胱癌患者结局的多机构分析。
J Urol. 2016 Jan;195(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.085. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
5
Postchemotherapy lymphadenectomy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: long-term efficacy and implications for trial design.转移性尿路上皮癌患者化疗后淋巴结清扫术:长期疗效及对试验设计的意义
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Feb;13(1):80-86.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
6
Outcome of metastasectomy for urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.尿路上皮癌转移切除术的结果:日本多机构回顾性研究。
J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):932-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
7
A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models.使用广义提升模型进行多种处理的倾向评分估计教程。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3388-414. doi: 10.1002/sim.5753. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
8
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
Is there a role for pulmonary metastasectomy with a curative intent in patients with metastatic urinary transitional cell carcinoma?对于转移性尿路上皮癌患者,是否存在以治愈为目的的肺转移灶切除术的作用?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):449-53. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.097.
10
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.平衡诊断用于比较倾向评分匹配样本中治疗组间基线协变量的分布。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697.