• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述实验性药物的扩大使用及同情用药项目。

Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs.

作者信息

Miller Jennifer E, Ross Joseph S, Moch Kenneth I, Caplan Arthur L

机构信息

Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, Office 723, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Bioethics International, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 28;10(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5
PMID:28754150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5534121/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the characteristics of "expanded access" and "compassionate use" programs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the percentage of drugs provided through these programs that ultimately received FDA marketing approval.

RESULTS

We identified 398 expanded access and compassionate use programs (hereafter referred to as expanded access programs) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Industry funded 61% (n = 241) of programs individually or collaboratively, while NIH and the US Federal Government rarely funded programs (3% [n = 11] and 2% [n = 6], respectively). Most programs provided access to drugs (71% [n = 282]), 11% to biologics (n = 43), and 10% to medical devices (n = 40). These programs covered 460 unique conditions, the most common being HIV (n = 26), leukemia (22), and multiple myeloma (n = 14). Only 2% of programs reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. Most programs (82%) were open to enrolling adults and seniors (n = 326). These programs provided access to 210 unique experimental drugs, of which 76% have received FDA approval.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的“扩大使用”和“同情用药”项目的特征,并确定通过这些项目提供的最终获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)上市批准的药物所占比例。

结果

我们在ClinicalTrials.gov上识别出398个扩大使用和同情用药项目(以下简称扩大使用项目)。行业单独或合作资助了61%(n = 241)的项目,而美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)和美国联邦政府很少资助项目(分别为3% [n = 11]和2% [n = 6])。大多数项目提供药物使用途径(71% [n = 282]),11%提供生物制品使用途径(n = 43),10%提供医疗器械使用途径(n = 40)。这些项目涵盖460种独特病症,最常见的是艾滋病病毒(HIV)(n = 26)、白血病(22)和多发性骨髓瘤(n = 14)。只有2%的项目在ClinicalTrials.gov上报告了结果。大多数项目(82%)对招募成年人和老年人开放(n = 326)。这些项目提供了210种独特实验药物的使用途径,其中76%已获得FDA批准。

相似文献

1
Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs.描述实验性药物的扩大使用及同情用药项目。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 28;10(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5.
2
Availability of Investigational Medicines Through the US Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access and Compassionate Use Programs.通过美国食品和药物管理局扩大准入和同情用药计划获得研究药物。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180283. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0283.
3
Access to Investigational Drugs: FDA Expanded Access Programs or "Right-to-Try" Legislation?获取试验用药物:美国食品药品监督管理局的扩大获取项目还是“尝试权”立法?
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):526-32. doi: 10.1111/cts.12255. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
4
Going "social" to access experimental and potentially life-saving treatment: an assessment of the policy and online patient advocacy environment for expanded access.通过“社交”途径获取实验性且可能挽救生命的治疗:对扩大获取途径的政策及在线患者维权环境的评估
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 2;14:17. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0568-8.
5
FDA Expanded Access Programs for Experimental Medicines.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)针对实验性药物的扩大可及性计划。
JAMA. 2015;314(12):1296. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.9725.
6
FDA Expanded Access Programs for Experimental Medicines--Reply.美国食品药品监督管理局针对实验性药物的扩大使用项目——回复
JAMA. 2015;314(12):1296. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.9728.
7
Should patients in need be given access to experimental drugs?有需求的患者应该获得实验性药物吗?
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;16(9):1275-9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1046837.
8
Oversight of Right-to-Try and Expanded Access Requests for Off-Trial Access to Investigational Drugs.对试验性药物非试验性使用的“尝试权”及扩大使用申请的监督。
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Jan;42(1):2-13. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500038.
9
Implementation of 21st Century Cures Act Expanded Access Policies Requirements.实施 21 世纪治愈法案扩大准入政策要求。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;110(6):1579-1584. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2401. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
10
Fair, just and compassionate: A pilot for making allocation decisions for patients requesting experimental drugs outside of clinical trials.公平、公正、富有同情心:为在临床试验之外申请使用实验性药物的患者做出分配决策的试点。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Nov;44(11):761-767. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103917. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Pharmaceutical services in expanded access, compassionate use, and post-trial access: the perspective of clinical researchers].[扩大准入、同情用药和试验后准入中的药学服务:临床研究人员的视角]
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Jun 27;41(5):e00128824. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT128824. eCollection 2025.
2
Conceptualisation and Role of Market Access in Pharmaceutical Industry: A Scoping Review.制药行业市场准入的概念化与作用:一项范围综述
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 May 1;12(2):81-99. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12020007. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
The need for a new keyword - "Trial registry-metaresearch" - to track certain uses of clinical trial registry records.需要一个新的关键词——“临床试验注册库元研究”——来跟踪临床试验注册库记录的某些用途。
Trials. 2023 Mar 14;24(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07231-1.
4
The 'false hope' argument in discussions on expanded access to investigational drugs: a critical assessment.讨论扩大试验性药物的获取途径时的“虚假希望”论点:批判性评估。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10106-y. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Regulating clinical trials in a resource-limited setting during the Ebola public health emergency in Sierra Leone.在塞拉利昂埃博拉公共卫生紧急情况下,对资源有限环境下的临床试验进行监管。
Trials. 2022 Jun 6;23(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06416-4.
6
Characteristics of the Compassionate Use Program in Japan: An Analysis of Expanded Access Clinical Trials from 2016 to 2021.日本同情用药计划的特点:2016 年至 2021 年扩大准入临床试验分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Oct;112(4):817-823. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2641. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
7
A comparative analysis of important public clinical trial registries, and a proposal for an interim ideal one.重要公共临床试验注册库的比较分析,及一个临时理想库的建议。
PLoS One. 2021 May 11;16(5):e0251191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251191. eCollection 2021.
8
The Role of Physicians in Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs: A Mixed-Methods Study of Physicians' Views and Experiences in The Netherlands.《扩大获得研究性药物的机会中医生的作用:荷兰医生的观点和经验的混合方法研究》
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Jul;18(2):319-334. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10090-7. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
9
Systematic review of extracellular vesicle-based treatments for lung injury: are EVs a potential therapy for COVID-19?基于细胞外囊泡治疗肺损伤的系统评价:细胞外囊泡是治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎的潜在疗法吗?
J Extracell Vesicles. 2020 Aug 6;9(1):1795365. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2020.1795365.
10
Experiences of caregivers of children with spinal muscular atrophy participating in the expanded access program for nusinersen: a longitudinal qualitative study.脊髓性肌萎缩症患儿照顾者参与nusinersen 扩大准入项目的体验:一项纵向定性研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Jul 29;15(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01477-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten-Year Experience for the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Part 2: FDA's Role in Ensuring Patient Safety.药品评价和研究中心的十年经验,第二部分:美国食品药品监督管理局在确保患者安全方面的作用。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar 1;51(2):246-249. doi: 10.1177/2168479016679214.
2
Overview of FDA's Expanded Access Program for Investigational Drugs.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)研究性药物扩大使用项目概述。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar 1;51(2):177-179. doi: 10.1177/2168479017694850.
3
The changing landscape of expanded access to investigational drugs for patients with unmet medical needs: ethical implications.为有未满足医疗需求的患者扩大试验性药物可及性的不断变化的局面:伦理影响。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Feb 21;10:10. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0100-3. eCollection 2017.
4
Participation of the elderly, women, and minorities in pivotal trials supporting 2011-2013 U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals.老年人、女性和少数族裔参与支持2011 - 2013年美国食品药品监督管理局批准的关键试验情况。
Trials. 2016 Apr 14;17:199. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1322-4.
5
The Ethical Challenges of Compassionate Use.同情用药的伦理挑战。
JAMA. 2016 Mar 8;315(10):979-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0416.
6
Going "social" to access experimental and potentially life-saving treatment: an assessment of the policy and online patient advocacy environment for expanded access.通过“社交”途径获取实验性且可能挽救生命的治疗:对扩大获取途径的政策及在线患者维权环境的评估
BMC Med. 2016 Feb 2;14:17. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0568-8.
7
The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials.在务实临床试验中纳入弱势群体的伦理与监管环境。
Clin Trials. 2015 Oct;12(5):503-10. doi: 10.1177/1740774515597701. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Compassionate use of experimental therapies: who should decide?实验性疗法的同情使用:应由谁来决定?
EMBO Mol Med. 2015 Oct;7(10):1248-50. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201505262.
9
Practical, legal, and ethical issues in expanded access to investigational drugs.扩大试验性药物可及性中的实践、法律及伦理问题。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 15;372(3):279-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle1409465.
10
The strange allure of state "right-to-try" laws.州“尝试权”法律的奇特吸引力。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1885-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5767.