Steib Simon, Klamroth Sarah, Gaßner Heiko, Pasluosta Cristian, Eskofier Björn, Winkler Jürgen, Klucken Jochen, Pfeifer Klaus
1 Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
2 University Hospital Erlangen, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Aug;31(8):758-768. doi: 10.1177/1545968317721976. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
Gait and balance dysfunction are major symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). Treadmill training improves gait characteristics in this population but does not reflect the dynamic nature of controlling balance during ambulation in everyday life contexts.
To evaluate whether postural perturbations during treadmill walking lead to superior effects on gait and balance performance compared with standard treadmill training.
In this single-blind randomized controlled trial, 43 PD patients (Hoehn & Yahr stage 1-3.5) were assigned to either an 8-week perturbed treadmill intervention (n = 21) or a control group (n = 22) training on the identical treadmill without perturbations. Patients were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and at 3 months' follow-up. Primary endpoints were overground gait speed and balance (Mini-BESTest). Secondary outcomes included fast gait speed, walking capacity (2-Minute Walk Test), dynamic balance (Timed Up-and-Go), static balance (postural sway), and balance confidence (Activities-Specific Balance Confidence [ABC] scale).
There were no significant between-group differences in change over time for the primary outcomes. At postintervention, both groups demonstrated similar improvements in overground gait speed ( P = .009), and no changes in the Mini-BESTest ( P = .641). A significant group-by-time interaction ( P = .048) existed for the Timed Up-and-Go, with improved performance only in the perturbation group. In addition, the perturbation but not the control group significantly increased walking capacity ( P = .038). Intervention effects were not sustained at follow-up.
Our primary findings suggest no superior effect of perturbation training on gait and balance in PD patients. However, some favorable trends existed for secondary gait and dynamic balance parameters, which should be investigated in future trials.
步态和平衡功能障碍是帕金森病(PD)的主要症状。跑步机训练可改善该人群的步态特征,但未反映出在日常生活环境中行走时控制平衡的动态特性。
评估与标准跑步机训练相比,跑步机行走过程中的姿势扰动是否对步态和平衡性能产生更优的效果。
在这项单盲随机对照试验中,43例PD患者(霍恩和亚尔分级为1-3.5级)被随机分为两组,一组接受为期8周的带有扰动的跑步机干预训练(n = 21),另一组为对照组(n = 22),在相同的无扰动跑步机上进行训练。在基线、干预后和3个月随访时对患者进行评估。主要终点指标为地面行走速度和平衡能力(简易BESTest量表)。次要结局指标包括快速行走速度、步行能力(2分钟步行试验)、动态平衡(计时起立行走测试)、静态平衡(姿势摆动)和平衡信心(特定活动平衡信心[ABC]量表)。
主要结局指标随时间的组间变化差异无统计学意义。干预后,两组地面行走速度均有相似程度的改善(P = .009),简易BESTest量表评分无变化(P = .641)。计时起立行走测试存在显著的组×时间交互作用(P = .048),仅扰动训练组的表现有所改善。此外,扰动训练组而非对照组显著提高了步行能力(P = .038)。随访时干预效果未持续存在。
我们的主要研究结果表明,扰动训练对PD患者的步态和平衡没有更优的效果。然而,在次要步态和动态平衡参数方面存在一些有利趋势,应在未来的试验中进一步研究。