Suppr超能文献

视角、主人公能力以及在关于2型糖尿病的健康叙事中的相似性的说服效果

Persuasive Effects of Point of View, Protagonist Competence, and Similarity in a Health Narrative About Type 2 Diabetes.

作者信息

Chen Meng, Bell Robert A, Taylor Laramie D

机构信息

a Department of Communication , University of California, Davis , Davis , California , USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2017 Aug;22(8):702-712. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1341568. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

We examined the persuasive effects of three narrative features in a message about type 2 diabetes: narrative point of view (first- vs. third-person perspective), protagonist competence (positive role model who prevents diabetes vs. negative role model who develops diabetes), and protagonist-reader similarity (demographically similar vs. dissimilar). We posited that a first-person point of view would elevate people's identification levels more than a third-person point of view, especially when the protagonist was depicted as a positive role model. We also expected a similar protagonist to foster greater levels of identification than a dissimilar one. In addition, the positive effect of a competent role model on identification was expected to be enhanced under the condition of reader-protagonist similarity. Finally, we hypothesized that the effects of identification on persuasion would be mediated by self-referencing. Participants 30 years of age or younger (N = 489) were randomly assigned to read a story about a person with a family history of type 2 diabetes that was altered with regard to the experimental factors. Thereafter they completed a questionnaire incorporating measures of study variables. Greater levels of identification were found to foster self-referencing, leading to persuasion. Identification was strongest with a first-person point of view and when the narrator was a positive role model. The effect of identification on persuasion was mediated by self-referencing. Contrary to expectations, protagonist-reader demographic similarity did not affect identification or self-referencing. There was no support for the two moderation hypotheses.

摘要

我们研究了在一条关于2型糖尿病的信息中三种叙事特征的说服效果:叙事视角(第一人称与第三人称视角)、主人公能力(预防糖尿病的正面榜样与患糖尿病的负面榜样)以及主人公与读者的相似性(人口统计学上相似与不相似)。我们假设第一人称视角比第三人称视角能更提升人们的认同程度,尤其是当主人公被描绘成正面榜样时。我们还预期相似的主人公比不相似的主人公能促进更高程度的认同。此外,在读者与主人公相似的条件下,有能力的榜样对认同的积极影响预计会增强。最后,我们假设认同对说服的影响将通过自我参照来介导。30岁及以下的参与者(N = 489)被随机分配阅读一个关于有2型糖尿病家族史的人的故事,该故事在实验因素方面有所改变。此后,他们完成了一份包含研究变量测量的问卷。结果发现更高程度的认同会促进自我参照,从而导致说服。第一人称视角以及叙述者是正面榜样时,认同最为强烈。认同对说服的影响通过自我参照来介导。与预期相反,主人公与读者在人口统计学上的相似性并未影响认同或自我参照。这两个调节假设均未得到支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验