Ikenaga Hiroki, Nakano Yukiko, Oda Noboru, Suenari Kazuyoshi, Sairaku Akinori, Tokuyama Takehito, Kawazoe Hiroshi, Matsumura Hiroya, Tomomori Shunsuke, Kihara Yasuki
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
J Arrhythm. 2017 Aug;33(4):256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.08.006. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to medical therapy remains controversial in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); the acute effects on the direct left atrial (LA) pressure are not completely understood.
We consecutively studied patients with HCM (=15) and without HCM (NHCM, =106) who underwent extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation for drug-refractory AF. We compared clinical parameters, echocardiographic parameters, electrophysiological parameters, LA pressures using hemodynamic catheterization and recurrence rate in both groups.
The LA volume index was significantly higher (51.9±13.6 mL/m vs. 41.6±12.7 mL/m, =0.02) in the HCM group than the NHCM group. The pre-ablation mean LA pressure was significantly higher in the HCM group than the NHCM group. Among the AF patients, the mean LA pressure decreased more significantly in the HCM group than the NHCM group (post-ablation minus pre-ablation pressures: 4.2±3.7 mmHg vs. 0.9±4.1 mmHg, 0.03). The early recurrence rate (within 30 days after ablation) tended to be higher in the HCM group than the NHCM group (20% vs. 5.7%, =0.08), but the rates of late recurrences (>30 days after ablation) were similar (13.3% vs. 7.6%, =0.83). Discontinuation of antiarrhythmic drugs occurred at rates of 13% and 62% in the HCM and NHCM groups, respectively (<0.001).
The LA pressure in the HCM group decreased immediately after AF RFCA. Patients with HCM and drug-refractory AF may benefit from RFCA.
对于肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者,药物治疗无效的心房颤动(AF)行射频导管消融(RFCA)仍存在争议;对左心房(LA)直接压力的急性影响尚未完全明确。
我们连续研究了因药物难治性AF接受广泛肺静脉隔离术的HCM患者(n = 15)和非HCM患者(NHCM,n = 106)。我们比较了两组的临床参数、超声心动图参数、电生理参数、使用血流动力学导管测量的LA压力和复发率。
HCM组的LA容积指数显著高于NHCM组(51.9±13.6 mL/m² 对 41.6±12.7 mL/m²,P = 0.02)。HCM组消融前的平均LA压力显著高于NHCM组。在AF患者中,HCM组的平均LA压力下降比NHCM组更显著(消融后减去消融前压力:4.2±3.7 mmHg对0.9±4.1 mmHg,P = 0.03)。HCM组的早期复发率(消融后30天内)倾向于高于NHCM组(20%对5.7%,P = 0.08),但晚期复发率(消融后>30天)相似(13.3%对7.6%,P = 0.83)。HCM组和NHCM组抗心律失常药物停药率分别为13%和62%(P<0.001)。
HCM组AF行RFCA后LA压力立即下降。HCM合并药物难治性AF患者可能从RFCA中获益。