Liu Guang Jian, Karim Md Rezaul, Xu Li Li, Wang Song Lin, Yang Chao, Ding Li, Wang Yun-Fu
Department of Neurology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
Department of Neurology, Wuhan Dongxihu District People's Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Front Neurol. 2017 Jul 14;8:316. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00316. eCollection 2017.
The aim of this study was to systematically review the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin in the treatment of sleep disturbance in patients with medical illness.
PubMed was searched for randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials that reported sleep changes during gabapentin treatment up to November 2015.
This review included 26 studies involving 4,684 participants. Except for Composite Endpoint 3 [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.05-0.22] compared with the placebo group, the gabapentin group showed superior outcomes on our endpoints: Composite Endpoint 1 (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28-0.71), Composite Endpoint 2 (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.30), Composite Endpoint 4 (SMD = -0.38, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.19), Composite Endpoint 5 [risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.24-2.58], and Composite Endpoint 6 (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.32-0.72). However, the patients in the gabapentin group showed worse tolerance than those in the placebo group (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08-1.76).
This study is the first to systematically assess the clinical value of gabapentin for the treatment of sleep disorders. We found that regardless the type of sleep outcomes, gabapentin displayed stable treatment efficacy for sleep disturbance in patients with medical illness. However, when an average dose of approximately 1,800 mg/day was used, the risk of treatment discontinuation or drug withdrawal was relatively high. We recommend that further studies confirm these findings in patients with primary sleep disorders.
本研究旨在系统评价加巴喷丁治疗内科疾病患者睡眠障碍的疗效和耐受性。
检索PubMed中截至2015年11月报道加巴喷丁治疗期间睡眠变化的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
本综述纳入26项研究,涉及4684名参与者。与安慰剂组相比,除复合终点3[标准化均数差(SMD)=0.09,95%置信区间(CI):-0.05-0.22]外,加巴喷丁组在我们的终点上显示出更好的结果:复合终点1(SMD=0.50,95%CI:0.28-0.71)、复合终点2(SMD=-0.53,95%CI:-0.77至-0.30)、复合终点4(SMD=-0.38,95%CI:-0.58至-0.19)、复合终点5[风险比(RR)=1.79,95%CI:1.24-2.58]和复合终点6(RR=0.48,95%CI:0.32-0.72)。然而,加巴喷丁组患者的耐受性比安慰剂组差(RR=1.38,95%CI:1.08-1.76)。
本研究首次系统评估了加巴喷丁治疗睡眠障碍的临床价值。我们发现,无论睡眠结果类型如何,加巴喷丁对内科疾病患者的睡眠障碍均显示出稳定的治疗效果。然而,当使用约1800mg/天的平均剂量时,停药或撤药风险相对较高。我们建议进一步研究在原发性睡眠障碍患者中证实这些发现。