Prakasam Gopinath, Singh Rajnish Kumar, Iqbal Mohammad Askandar, Saini Sunil Kumar, Tiku Ashu Bhan, Bamezai Rameshwar N K
From the School of Life Sciences and.
Department of Microbiology and Tumor Virology Program of the Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, and.
J Biol Chem. 2017 Sep 15;292(37):15561-15576. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.791343. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
Preferential expression of the low-activity (dimeric) M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (PK) over its constitutively active splice variant M1 isoform is considered critical for aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. However, our results reported here indicate co-expression of PKM1 and PKM2 and their possible physical interaction in cancer cells. We show that knockdown of either PKM1 or PKM2 differentially affects net PK activity, viability, and cellular ATP levels of the lung carcinoma cell lines H1299 and A549. The stable knockdown of PK isoforms in A549 cells significantly reduced the cellular ATP level, whereas in H1299 cells the level of ATP was unaltered. Interestingly, the PKM1/2 knockdown in H1299 cells activated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling and stimulated mitochondrial biogenesis and autophagy to maintain energy homeostasis. In contrast, knocking down either of the PKM isoforms in A549 cells lacking LKB1, a serine/threonine protein kinase upstream of AMPK, failed to activate AMPK and sustain energy homeostasis and resulted in apoptosis. Moreover, in a similar genetic background of silenced PKM1 or PKM2, the knocking down of AMPKα1/2 catalytic subunit in H1299 cells induced apoptosis. Our findings help explain why previous targeting of PKM2 in cancer cells to control tumor growth has not met with the expected success. We suggest that this lack of success is because of AMPK-mediated energy metabolism rewiring, protecting cancer cell viability. On the basis of our observations, we propose an alternative therapeutic strategy of silencing either of the PKM isoforms along with AMPK in tumors.
丙酮酸激酶(PK)低活性(二聚体)M2亚型相对于其组成型活性剪接变体M1亚型的优先表达被认为对癌细胞的有氧糖酵解至关重要。然而,我们在此报告的结果表明,PKM1和PKM2在癌细胞中共表达及其可能的物理相互作用。我们发现,敲低PKM1或PKM2会对肺癌细胞系H1299和A549的净PK活性、活力和细胞ATP水平产生不同影响。在A549细胞中稳定敲低PK亚型显著降低了细胞ATP水平,而在H1299细胞中ATP水平未改变。有趣的是,在H1299细胞中敲低PKM1/2激活了AMP激活的蛋白激酶(AMPK)信号通路,并刺激线粒体生物发生和自噬以维持能量稳态。相比之下,在缺乏AMPK上游丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶LKB1的A549细胞中敲低任何一种PKM亚型均未能激活AMPK并维持能量稳态,从而导致细胞凋亡。此外,在沉默PKM1或PKM2的相似遗传背景下,在H1299细胞中敲低AMPKα1/2催化亚基会诱导细胞凋亡。我们的发现有助于解释为什么之前在癌细胞中靶向PKM2以控制肿瘤生长未取得预期成功。我们认为这种缺乏成功是由于AMPK介导的能量代谢重编程,保护了癌细胞的活力。基于我们的观察结果,我们提出了一种在肿瘤中同时沉默PKM亚型和AMPK的替代治疗策略。