Suppr超能文献

Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature.

作者信息

Swain Sudeepta Kumar, Kollu Sri Harsha, Patooru Vijaya Kumar, Munikrishnan Venkatesh

机构信息

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology (Colorectal Unit), Apollo Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(1):33-36. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_241_16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive ventral rectopexy is a well-described technique for management of rectal prolapse. Robotic system has proven its advantage for surgeries in the pelvis. Applying this technique, ventral rectopexy can be done more precisely with minimal recurrence. With growing experience, the operative duration and cost of robotic ventral rectopexy can be reduced with better outcome. Few case studies have been described in literature with no study from Indian subcontinent. We describe a series of eight cases of robotic ventral rectopexy done for rectal prolapse in a tertiary health-care centre of India.

METHODS

A total of 8 patients were operated for complete rectal prolapse during the period from August 2015 to April 2016. da Vinci Si robotic surgical system was used with prolene or permacol mesh for ventral rectopexy. All patients were prospectively followed for a period minimum of 3 months. Pre- and intra-operative findings were recorded along with post-operative outcome.

RESULTS

Out of eight patients, prolene mesh was used in five patients and permacol mesh (porcine collagen) in three patients. Mean operative time (console time) was 177 min and mean total time was 218 min. Mean blood loss was 23.7 ml. Functional outcome was satisfactory in all patients. There was no significant complication in any patient with mean hospital stay of 2.2 days. With average follow-up of 8.8 months, no patient had recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Robotic ventral rectopexy is a safe technique for rectal prolapse with excellent result in terms of functional outcome, recurrence and complications. With experience, the duration and cost can be comparable to laparoscopic technique.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8e9/5749195/bd0500f56ca6/JMAS-14-33-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic ventral rectopexy: Initial experience in an Indian tertiary health-care centre and review of literature.
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(1):33-36. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_241_16.
3
Robotic vs. laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception: a systematic review.
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Jun;23(6):529-535. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02014-w. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
4
Robot-Assisted Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A 5-Year Experience at a Tertiary Referral Center.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Nov;60(11):1215-1223. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000895.
6
Day case robotic ventral rectopexy compared with day case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective study.
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Oct;20(10):695-700. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1518-3. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
Technical modifications for cost optimization in robot-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy: an initial experience.
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Jul;27(7):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02756-8. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
9
Increased cost burden associated with robot-assisted rectopexy: do patient outcomes justify increased expenditure?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2119-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09728-3. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
10
Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-institution experience.
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Aug;21(8):667-671. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1675-z. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Ventral mesh rectopexy: is this the new standard for surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Dec;57(12):1446-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000248.
2
Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S153-S159. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.359. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
3
Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Sep;29(9):1113-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1937-4. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
7
Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jul;56(7):909-14. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318289366e.
8
Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):598-606. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Mar;54(3):342-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f4737e.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验