Consumer and Sensory Science, Division of Food Science, NOFIMA AS, Ås, Norway; School of Economics and Business, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway; Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, United States.
MAPP Centre, Research on Value Creation in the Food Sector, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Food Res Int. 2017 Sep;99(Pt 1):58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
Consumers in industrialized countries are nowadays much more interested in information about the production methods and components of the food products that they eat, than they had been 50years ago. Some production methods are perceived as less "natural" (i.e. conventional agriculture) while some food components are seen as "unhealthy" and "unfamiliar" (i.e. artificial additives). This phenomenon, often referred to as the "clean label" trend, has driven the food industry to communicate whether a certain ingredient or additive is not present or if the food has been produced using a more "natural" production method (i.e. organic agriculture). However, so far there is no common and objective definition of clean label. This review paper aims to fill the gap via three main objectives, which are to a) develop and suggest a definition that integrates various understandings of clean label into one single definition, b) identify the factors that drive consumers' choices through a review of recent studies on consumer perception of various food categories understood as clean label with the focus on organic, natural and 'free from' artificial additives/ingredients food products and c) discuss implications of the consumer demand for clean label food products for food manufacturers as well as policy makers. We suggest to define clean label, both in a broad sense, where consumers evaluate the cleanliness of product by assumption and through inference looking at the front-of-pack label and in a strict sense, where consumers evaluate the cleanliness of product by inspection and through inference looking at the back-of-pack label. Results show that while 'health' is a major consumer motive, a broad diversity of drivers influence the clean label trend with particular relevance of intrinsic or extrinsic product characteristics and socio-cultural factors. However, 'free from' artificial additives/ingredients food products tend to differ from organic and natural products. Food manufacturers should take the diversity of these drivers into account in developing new products and communication about the latter. For policy makers, it is important to work towards a more homogenous understanding and application of the term of clean label and identify a uniform definition or regulation for 'free from' artificial additives/ingredients food products, as well as work towards decreasing consumer misconceptions. Finally, multiple future research avenues are discussed.
如今,工业化国家的消费者对他们所食用的食品的生产方法和成分的信息比对 50 年前更感兴趣。一些生产方法被认为不太“自然”(例如传统农业),而一些食品成分则被视为“不健康”和“不熟悉”(例如人工添加剂)。这种现象通常被称为“清洁标签”趋势,促使食品行业传达某种成分或添加剂是否不存在,或者食品是否使用更“天然”的生产方法(例如有机农业)生产。然而,到目前为止,还没有关于清洁标签的通用和客观定义。本文旨在通过三个主要目标来填补这一空白,这三个目标是:a)制定并提出一个将清洁标签的各种理解整合到一个单一定义中的定义;b)通过审查最近关于消费者对各种食品类别的感知的研究,确定驱动消费者选择的因素,重点是有机、天然和“不含”人工添加剂/成分的食品产品;c)讨论消费者对清洁标签食品产品的需求对食品制造商和政策制定者的影响。我们建议在广义上定义清洁标签,即消费者通过假设和通过查看正面标签进行推断来评估产品的清洁度,以及在狭义上定义清洁标签,即消费者通过检查和通过查看背面标签进行推断来评估产品的清洁度。结果表明,虽然“健康”是消费者的主要动机,但许多因素也影响了清洁标签的趋势,特别是产品的内在或外在特性以及社会文化因素。然而,“不含”人工添加剂/成分的食品产品与有机和天然产品不同。食品制造商在开发新产品和宣传新产品时应考虑这些驱动因素的多样性。对于政策制定者而言,重要的是努力实现对清洁标签术语的更一致的理解和应用,并为“不含”人工添加剂/成分的食品产品确定统一的定义或法规,同时努力减少消费者的误解。最后,讨论了多个未来的研究方向。