Li Ping, Zheng Ying, Chen Xin
State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 12;8:460. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00460. eCollection 2017.
Although initially described as an anti-tumor mediator, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) is generally considered as the master pro-inflammatory cytokine. It plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriasis. Consequently, anti-TNF therapy has become mainstay treatment for autoimmune diseases. Historically, anti-inflammatory agents were developed before the identification of TNF. Salicylates, the active components of spp., were identified in the mid-19th century for the alleviation of pain, fever, and inflammatory responses. Study of this naturally occurring compound led to the discovery of aspirin, which was followed by the development of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) due to the chemical advances in the 19th-20th centuries. Initially, the most of NSAIDs were organic acid, but the non-acidic compounds were also identified as NSAIDs. Although effective in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, NSAIDs have some undesirable and adverse effect, such as ulcers, kidney injury, and bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract. In the past two decades, anti-TNF biologics were developed. Drugs belong to this class include soluble TNF receptor 2 fusion protein and anti-TNF antibodies. The introduction of anti-TNF therapeutics has revolutionized the management of autoimmune diseases, such as RA, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), plaque psoriasis (PP), AS, CD and ulcerative colitis (UC). Nevertheless, up to 40% of patients have no response to anti-TNF treatment. Furthermore, this treatment is associated with some adverse effects such as increased risk of infection, and even triggered the development of autoimmune diseases. Such harmful effect of anti-TNF treatment is likely caused by the global inhibition of TNF biological functions. Therefore, specific inhibition of TNF receptor (TNFR1 or TNFR2) may represent a safer and more effective treatment, as proposed by some recent studies. In this review article, the historical development of anti-inflammatory drugs after World War II as briefly described above will be reviewed and analyzed. The future trend in the development of novel TNF receptor-targeting therapeutics will be discussed in the context of latest progress in the research of TNF biology.
尽管肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF)最初被描述为一种抗肿瘤介质,但它通常被认为是主要的促炎细胞因子。它在类风湿性关节炎(RA)、炎症性肠病、强直性脊柱炎(AS)和银屑病等炎症性疾病的发病机制中起着关键作用。因此,抗TNF治疗已成为自身免疫性疾病的主要治疗方法。从历史上看,抗炎药物在TNF被发现之前就已开发出来。水杨酸盐是柳树皮等植物的活性成分,在19世纪中叶被发现可缓解疼痛、发热和炎症反应。对这种天然化合物的研究导致了阿司匹林的发现,随后在19世纪至20世纪由于化学进步而开发出了非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。最初,大多数NSAIDs是有机酸,但非酸性化合物也被确定为NSAIDs。尽管NSAIDs在治疗炎症性疾病方面有效,但它们有一些不良和有害作用,如溃疡、肾损伤和胃肠道出血。在过去二十年中,开发了抗TNF生物制剂。属于这一类别的药物包括可溶性TNF受体2融合蛋白和抗TNF抗体。抗TNF治疗药物的引入彻底改变了自身免疫性疾病的管理,如RA、银屑病关节炎(PsA)、斑块状银屑病(PP)、AS、克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。然而,高达40%的患者对抗TNF治疗无反应。此外,这种治疗与一些不良反应有关,如感染风险增加,甚至引发自身免疫性疾病的发展。抗TNF治疗的这种有害作用可能是由TNF生物学功能的全面抑制引起的。因此,如最近一些研究所提出的,特异性抑制TNF受体(TNFR1或TNFR2)可能代表一种更安全、更有效的治疗方法。在这篇综述文章中,将对上述二战后抗炎药物的历史发展进行简要回顾和分析。将在TNF生物学研究的最新进展背景下讨论新型TNF受体靶向治疗药物的未来发展趋势。