Brunner-La Rocca Hans-Peter, Bektas Sema
Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Card Fail Rev. 2015 Oct;1(2):96-101. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2015.1.2.96.
This review article addresses the question of whether biomarker-guided therapy is ready for clinical implementation in chronic heart failure. The most well-known biomarkers in heart failure are natriuretic peptides, namely B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP. They are well-established in the diagnostic process of acute heart failure and prediction of disease prognosis. They may also be helpful in screening patients at risk of developing heart failure. Although studied by 11 small- to medium-scale trials resulting in several positive meta-analyses, it is less well-established whether natriuretic peptides are also helpful for guiding chronic heart failure therapy. This uncertainty is expressed by differences in European and American guideline recommendations. In addition to reviewing the evidence surrounding the use of natriuretic peptides to guide chronic heart failure therapy, this article gives an overview of the shortcomings of the trials, how the results may be interpreted and the future directions necessary to fill the current gaps in knowledge. Therapy guidance in chronic heart failure using other biomarkers has not been prospectively tested to date. Emerging biomarkers, such as galectin-3 and soluble ST2, might be useful in this regard, as suggested by several analyses.
这篇综述文章探讨了生物标志物引导的治疗是否已准备好在慢性心力衰竭中临床应用的问题。心力衰竭中最知名的生物标志物是利钠肽,即B型利钠肽(BNP)和N末端前脑钠肽原(NT-proBNP)。它们在急性心力衰竭的诊断过程和疾病预后预测中已得到充分确立。它们也可能有助于筛查有发生心力衰竭风险的患者。尽管有11项中小规模试验对其进行了研究并产生了几项阳性的荟萃分析,但利钠肽是否也有助于指导慢性心力衰竭治疗尚未得到充分确立。欧美指南建议的差异体现了这种不确定性。除了回顾围绕使用利钠肽指导慢性心力衰竭治疗的证据外,本文还概述了试验的不足之处、结果的解读方式以及填补当前知识空白所需的未来方向。迄今为止,尚未对使用其他生物标志物指导慢性心力衰竭治疗进行前瞻性测试。一些分析表明,新兴的生物标志物,如半乳凝素-3和可溶性ST2,在这方面可能有用。