Suppr超能文献

马尾综合征的生活体验:定性分析。

The lived experience of Cauda Equina Syndrome: a qualitative analysis.

机构信息

Oxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Clinical Psychology, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2018 Jan;56(1):41-45. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.92. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

An exploratory qualitative analysis, using semi-structured interviews to investigate the lived experience of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES).

OBJECTIVES

To address the paucity of psychological research into CES and explore patient experiences of living with the injury.

SETTING

The study was conducted in the United Kingdom. Recruitment was via two National Health Service spinal services in the South East of England and an online CES charity.

METHODS

An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) methodology was employed. Eleven participants took part in the study and completed an interview consisting of seven open ended questions relating to the psychosocial impact of CES. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed following an IPA procedure.

RESULTS

Three superordinate themes were generated. The first, Dissatisfaction with care: 'I felt very abandoned', captured experiences of feeling neglected and disbelieved by the healthcare system and a wish for symptoms to be validated. The second, Hidden to others: 'Nobody knows. It's horrible', spoke to a struggle to gain a social identity in relation to a hidden disability. The third, Changing identities: 'You become someone totally totally different' versus 'You're still the same person', captured a process of renegotiating identity following CES.

CONCLUSION

Findings highlight the importance of improving access to support for people with CES, as well as validating and facilitating disclosure of hidden symptoms. There is a clear need for more research into the psychosocial impact of this injury.

摘要

研究设计

采用半结构化访谈进行探索性定性分析,以调查马尾综合征(CES)的实际体验。

研究目的

解决 CES 心理研究不足的问题,并探讨患者受伤后生活的体验。

研究地点

英国。在英格兰东南部的两个国家卫生服务脊髓服务处和一个在线 CES 慈善机构进行招募。

研究方法

采用解释现象学分析(IPA)方法。11 名参与者参与了研究,并完成了一项访谈,其中包含 7 个与 CES 的心理社会影响相关的开放性问题。访谈以音频形式记录,逐字转录,并按照 IPA 程序进行分析。

研究结果

生成了三个上位主题。第一个主题是“对护理的不满:“我感到非常被抛弃”,捕捉到了患者感到被医疗保健系统忽视和不信任的体验,以及对症状得到验证的渴望。第二个主题是“对他人隐藏:“没人知道。太可怕了”,涉及到在与隐藏残疾相关的方面,努力获得社会认同的挣扎。第三个主题是“改变身份:“你变成了一个完全不同的人”与“你还是同一个人”,捕捉到 CES 后重新协商身份的过程。

结论

研究结果强调了改善 CES 患者获得支持的机会的重要性,以及验证和促进隐藏症状的披露。显然需要更多研究 CES 对心理社会影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验