Suppr超能文献

中心静脉导管插入术机械并发症发生率及实习医生认知的当代评估

A Contemporary Assessment of Mechanical Complication Rates and Trainee Perceptions of Central Venous Catheter Insertion.

作者信息

Heidemann Lauren, Nathani Niket, Sagana Rommel, Chopra Veneet, Heung Michael

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2017 Aug;12(8):646-651. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2784.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding rates of mechanical complications of ultrasound-guided, nontunneled central venous catheters (CVC). Similarly, trainee perceptions surrounding CVC complications are largely unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate contemporary CVC mechanical complication rates, associated risk factors, and trainee perspectives.

DESIGN

A single-center retrospective review of CVC procedures between June 1, 2014, and May 1, 2015. Electronic survey distributed to internal medicine trainees.

SETTING

Intensive care units and the emergency department at an academic hospital.

MEASUREMENTS

Electronic health records of patients with CVC procedures were reviewed for complications. Demographic and procedural characteristics were compared for complicated vs uncomplicated procedures. Student t tests and chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 730 reviewed records, 14 serious mechanical complications occurred due to pneumothorax (n = 5), bleeding (n = 3), vascular injury (n = 3), stroke (n = 1), and death (n = 2). Risk factors for complicated vs uncomplicated CVC placement included subclavian location (21.4% vs 7.8%, 𝑃 = 0.001), number of attempts (2.2 vs 1.5, 𝑃 = 0.02), unsuccessful CVC (21.4% vs. 4.3%, 𝑃 = 0.001), attending supervision (61.5% vs 34.7%, 𝑃 = 0.04), low body mass index (mean 25.7 kg/ m² vs 31.5 kg/m², 𝑃 = 0.001), anticoagulation (28.6% vs 20.6%, 𝑃 = 0.048), and ventilation (78.5% vs 66.5%, 𝑃 = 0.001). Survey data suggested deficiencies in managing unsuccessful CVC procedures; specifically, only 35% (N = 21/60) of trainees regularly perform chest x-rays after failed CVC attempt.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a 1.9% rate of mechanical complications associated with CVC placement. Our study confirms historical data that unsuccessful CVC attempts are an important risk factor for complications. Education regarding unsuccessful CVC placement may improve patient safety.

摘要

背景

关于超声引导下非隧道式中心静脉导管(CVC)机械并发症发生率的数据有限。同样,实习医生对CVC并发症的认知情况也大多未知。

目的

评估当代CVC机械并发症发生率、相关危险因素以及实习医生的观点。

设计

对2014年6月1日至2015年5月1日期间的CVC操作进行单中心回顾性研究。向内科实习医生发放电子调查问卷。

地点

一所学术医院的重症监护病房和急诊科。

测量

回顾接受CVC操作患者的电子健康记录以了解并发症情况。比较发生并发症与未发生并发症操作的人口统计学和操作特征。分别使用学生t检验和卡方检验比较连续变量和分类变量。

结果

在730份回顾记录中,因气胸(n = 5)、出血(n = 3)、血管损伤(n = 3)、中风(n = 1)和死亡(n = 2)发生了14例严重机械并发症。CVC置管发生并发症与未发生并发症的危险因素包括锁骨下位置(21.4%对7.8%,P = 0.001)、尝试次数(2.2次对1.5次,P = 0.02)、CVC置管未成功(21.4%对4.3%,P = 0.001)、上级医生监督(61.5%对34.7%,P = 0.04)、低体重指数(平均25.7kg/m²对31.5kg/m²,P = 0.001)、抗凝治疗(28.6%对20.6%,P = 0.048)和通气(78.5%对66.5%,P = 0.001)。调查数据表明在处理未成功的CVC操作方面存在不足;具体而言,只有35%(N = 21/60)的实习医生在CVC置管失败后定期进行胸部X光检查。

结论

我们观察到CVC置管相关机械并发症发生率为1.9%。我们的研究证实了既往数据,即CVC置管未成功是并发症的一个重要危险因素。关于CVC置管未成功的教育可能会提高患者安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验