Suppr超能文献

锁定髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的比较

Locking intramedullary nails versus locking plates for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

作者信息

Gracitelli Mauro E C, Malavolta Eduardo A, Assunção Jorge H, Ferreira Neto Arnaldo A, Silva Jorge S, Hernandez Arnaldo José

机构信息

a Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine , University of São Paulo , Sao Paulo , Brazil.

出版信息

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Sep;14(9):733-739. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1364624. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

Abstract

Proximal humerus fractures (PHF) are common fractures and are the third most common type of fractures among older adults. The most commonly used implants include the locking plate and the locking intramedullary nail. Areas covered: The aim of this study is to perform a literature review of biomechanical and clinical studies that compare the locking plate and intramedullary nail for PHF osteosynthesis. Expert commentary: Twelve clinical studies and seven biomechanical studies were identified that met this criterion. The findings of this review showed that intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation yielded similar functional results, but with contrasting complication rates. The biomechanical studies showed controversial results, with most of the studies demonstrating better biomechanical properties for the intramedullary nail. Different types of intramedullary nail for PHF have different characteristics, with curvilinear nails presenting a higher risk of complications.

摘要

肱骨近端骨折(PHF)是常见骨折,在老年人中是第三常见的骨折类型。最常用的植入物包括锁定钢板和锁定髓内钉。涵盖领域:本研究的目的是对比较锁定钢板和髓内钉用于PHF骨合成的生物力学和临床研究进行文献综述。专家评论:确定了12项临床研究和7项生物力学研究符合该标准。本综述的结果表明,髓内钉固定和锁定钢板固定产生相似的功能结果,但并发症发生率相反。生物力学研究结果存在争议,大多数研究表明髓内钉具有更好的生物力学性能。不同类型的用于PHF的髓内钉具有不同特点,弧形髓内钉并发症风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验