Osbak Kara, Abdellati Said, Tsoumanis Achilleas, Van Esbroeck Marjan, Kestens Luc, Crucitti Tania, Kenyon Chris
Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
J Med Microbiol. 2017 Aug;66(8):1130-1139. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000559.
We evaluated the Sekure rapid plasma reagin (RPR-S) (Sekisui Diagnostics) automated quantitative latex immunoturbidimetric assay performed on the SK500 clinical chemistry system for clinical appropriateness. Syphilis-infected individuals and controls were recruited into a prospective cohort study conducted at a sexually transmitted infection clinic in Antwerp, Belgium. Sera collected at diagnosis (baseline) and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-treatment were tested with RPR-S and Macro-Vue RPR card (RPR-C) (Becton Dickinson) assays; RPR-C was considered the reference test. IgG/IgM enzyme immunoassay and serum PCR results were consulted by discordancy at baseline. Categorical analyses were performed and correlations were assessed with (non)-linear regression. Post-treatment longitudinal serological evolution was evaluated. A total of 463 samples from 120 new syphilis cases from a variety of clinical stages and 30 syphilis-negative controls were tested. Initially, there was a weak correlation between quantitative RPR-C/S (=0.15). In 70 samples there was a strong suspicion of hook effect. Of these, 57/70 sera were retested with an extra dilution step, resulting in an average 12-fold increase in quantitative RPR-S results. After the extra dilution, the overall qualitative RPR-C/S agreement was 78.89 %, (κ-coefficient: 0.484). Of the 92 discordant samples, 9 were from the baseline visit (RPR-C titre: 1-8), which could have led to possible missed diagnoses using the RPR-S. The sensitivity and accuracy of the RPR-S test requires improvement before it can be used to diagnose syphilis and evaluate treatment efficacy in clinical practice.
我们评估了在SK500临床化学系统上进行的Sekure快速血浆反应素(RPR-S)(积水诊断公司)自动定量乳胶免疫比浊法的临床适用性。梅毒感染个体和对照被纳入在比利时安特卫普的一家性传播感染诊所进行的前瞻性队列研究。在诊断时(基线)以及治疗后3、6、9和12个月采集的血清用RPR-S和Macro-Vue RPR卡(RPR-C)(BD公司)检测;RPR-C被视为参考检测。在基线时通过不一致性参考IgG/IgM酶免疫测定和血清PCR结果。进行分类分析并通过(非)线性回归评估相关性。评估治疗后纵向血清学演变。共检测了来自120例不同临床阶段新梅毒病例的463份样本以及30例梅毒阴性对照。最初,定量RPR-C/S之间存在弱相关性(=0.15)。在70份样本中强烈怀疑存在钩状效应。其中,57/70份血清通过额外稀释步骤重新检测,导致定量RPR-S结果平均增加12倍。额外稀释后,总体定性RPR-C/S一致性为78.89%,(κ系数:0.484)。在92份不一致样本中,9份来自基线访视(RPR-C滴度:1 - 8),这可能导致使用RPR-S时出现可能的漏诊。在可用于临床实践中诊断梅毒和评估治疗效果之前,RPR-S检测的敏感性和准确性需要提高。