Suppr超能文献

野生鸟类种群中觅食鸟群间遗传变异的社会和空间效应。

Social and spatial effects on genetic variation between foraging flocks in a wild bird population.

作者信息

Radersma Reinder, Garroway Colin J, Santure Anna W, de Cauwer Isabelle, Farine Damien R, Slate Jon, Sheldon Ben C

机构信息

Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Mol Ecol. 2017 Oct;26(20):5807-5819. doi: 10.1111/mec.14291. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

Social interactions are rarely random. In some instances, animals exhibit homophily or heterophily, the tendency to interact with similar or dissimilar conspecifics, respectively. Genetic homophily and heterophily influence the evolutionary dynamics of populations, because they potentially affect sexual and social selection. Here, we investigate the link between social interactions and allele frequencies in foraging flocks of great tits (Parus major) over three consecutive years. We constructed co-occurrence networks which explicitly described the splitting and merging of 85,602 flocks through time (fission-fusion dynamics), at 60 feeding sites. Of the 1,711 birds in those flocks, we genotyped 962 individuals at 4,701 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). By combining genomewide genotyping with repeated field observations of the same individuals, we were able to investigate links between social structure and allele frequencies at a much finer scale than was previously possible. We explicitly accounted for potential spatial effects underlying genetic structure at the population level. We modelled social structure and spatial configuration of great tit fission-fusion dynamics with eigenvector maps. Variance partitioning revealed that allele frequencies were strongly affected by group fidelity (explaining 27%-45% of variance) as individuals tended to maintain associations with the same conspecifics. These conspecifics were genetically more dissimilar than expected, shown by genomewide heterophily for pure social (i.e., space-independent) grouping preferences. Genomewide homophily was linked to spatial configuration, indicating spatial segregation of genotypes. We did not find evidence for homophily or heterophily for putative socially relevant candidate genes or any other SNP markers. Together, these results demonstrate the importance of distinguishing social and spatial processes in determining population structure.

摘要

社会互动很少是随机的。在某些情况下,动物表现出同质性或异质性,即分别倾向于与相似或不同的同种个体进行互动。基因同质性和异质性会影响种群的进化动态,因为它们可能会影响性选择和社会选择。在这里,我们连续三年研究了大山雀(Parus major)觅食群体中社会互动与等位基因频率之间的联系。我们构建了共现网络,明确描述了60个觅食地点85,602个鸟群随时间的分裂和合并(裂变-融合动态)。在这些鸟群中的1711只鸟中,我们对962只个体的4701个常染色体单核苷酸多态性(SNP)进行了基因分型。通过将全基因组基因分型与对相同个体的重复实地观察相结合,我们能够在比以前更精细的尺度上研究社会结构与等位基因频率之间的联系。我们明确考虑了种群水平上遗传结构潜在的空间效应。我们用特征向量图对大山雀裂变-融合动态的社会结构和空间配置进行了建模。方差分解表明,等位基因频率受到群体忠诚度的强烈影响(解释了27%-45%的方差),因为个体倾向于与相同的同种个体保持关联。这些同种个体在基因上比预期的更不相似,这通过纯社会(即与空间无关)分组偏好的全基因组异质性得以体现。全基因组同质性与空间配置有关,表明基因型的空间隔离。我们没有发现假定的与社会相关的候选基因或任何其他SNP标记存在同质性或异质性的证据。总之,这些结果证明了区分社会和空间过程在确定种群结构中的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验