Suppr超能文献

养老院居民使用髋部保护器的接受度和依从性的预测因素。

Predictors of uptake and adherence to the use of hip protectors among nursing-home residents.

作者信息

Bentzen Hege, Bergland Astrid, Forsén Lisa

机构信息

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Oslo University College, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2008 Aug 22;5(3):253-263. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0088-2. eCollection 2008 Sep.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify predictors for initial uptake and adherence with the use of hip protectors when offering hip protectors free of charge to nursing-home residents. An 18 months prospective follow up study was carried out in 18 Norwegian nursing homes. One thousand two hundred and thirty-six residents were included in the study of which 604 started to use a hip protector. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify predictors for the initial uptake. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors for adherence. A stepwise backward strategy was used in both the logistic and in the Cox regression. The effect of nursing homes as clusters was adjusted for in the analysis. The uptake rate among all residents was 46% and the adherence was approximately 75% after 3 months, and approximately 60% after 18 months. Female gender [odds ratio (OR): 1.54, 95% CI: 1.06-2.24,  = 0.022], previous fractures (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.02-2.75,  = 0.043), previous falls (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.35-3.19,  < 0.001) and memory (not able to memorise: OR: 3.71, 95% CI: 2.09-6.59,  < 0.001, large problems with memorising: OR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.81-4.49,  < 0.001, medium problems with memorising: OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.39-4.33,  = 0.002, some problems with memorising: OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.14-3.48,  = 0.016) seemed to be important predictors for uptake. Among those who took up the offer male gender (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.00-2.91,  = 0.049), memory (not able to memorise: HR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.14-0.50,  < 0.001, large problems with memorising: HR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.22-0.45,  < 0.001, medium problems with memorising: HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30-0.73,  < 0.001, some problems with memorising: HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.73,  = 0.001) and bowel incontinence (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.25-0.66,  < 0.001) were predictors for a lower probability of ending hip protector use. Factors related to a high risk of falling were important predictors for both uptake and adherence. The fact that neither memory impairments nor incontinence (bowel) seemed to be barriers to hip protector use is important since these characteristics are common among nursing-home residents and tertiary prevention such as the use of hip protectors is probably the most feasible intervention to prevent hip fractures in this group.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定在向养老院居民免费提供髋部保护器时,初始使用和坚持使用髋部保护器的预测因素。在挪威的18家养老院进行了一项为期18个月的前瞻性随访研究。1236名居民被纳入研究,其中604人开始使用髋部保护器。使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定初始使用的预测因素。使用Cox比例风险模型确定坚持使用的预测因素。在逻辑回归和Cox回归中均采用逐步向后策略。在分析中对养老院作为聚类的效应进行了调整。所有居民的使用率为46%,3个月后的坚持率约为75%,18个月后约为60%。女性[比值比(OR):1.54,95%置信区间:1.06 - 2.24,P = 0.022]、既往骨折(OR:1.67,95%置信区间:1.02 - 2.75,P = 0.043)、既往跌倒(OR:2.08,95%置信区间:1.35 - 3.19,P < 0.001)和记忆力(无法记忆:OR:3.71,95%置信区间:2.09 - 6.59,P < 0.001,记忆有大问题:OR:2.85,95%置信区间:1.81 - 4.49,P < 0.001,记忆有中等问题:OR:2.45,95%置信区间:1.39 - 4.33,P = 0.002,记忆有一些问题:OR:1.99,95%置信区间:1.14 - 3.48,P = 0.016)似乎是使用的重要预测因素。在接受提供的人群中,男性(风险比:1.71,95%置信区间:1.00 - 2.91,P = 0.049)、记忆力(无法记忆:风险比:0.26,95%置信区间:0.14 - 0.50,P < 0.001,记忆有大问题:风险比:0.32,95%置信区间:0.22 - 0.45,P < 0.001,记忆有中等问题:风险比:0.46,95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.73,P < 0.001,记忆有一些问题:风险比:0.49,95%置信区间:0.32 - (此处原文有误,应为0.75),P = 0.001)和大便失禁(风险比:0.41,95%置信区间:0.25 - 0.66,P < 0.001)是停止使用髋部保护器可能性较低的预测因素。与高跌倒风险相关的因素是使用和坚持使用的重要预测因素。记忆力受损和失禁(大便)似乎都不是使用髋部保护器的障碍,这一事实很重要,因为这些特征在养老院居民中很常见,而三级预防如使用髋部保护器可能是预防该群体髋部骨折最可行的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Predictors of uptake and adherence to the use of hip protectors among nursing-home residents.
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Aug 22;5(3):253-263. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0088-2. eCollection 2008 Sep.
2
Predictors of adherence to the use of hip protectors in nursing home residents.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Mar;52(3):340-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52103.x.
3
Factors affecting adherence to use of hip protectors amongst residents of nursing homes--a correlation study.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):672-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
4
Availability and use of hip protectors in residents of nursing homes.
Osteoporos Int. 2011 May;22(5):1593-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1366-3. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
6
Compliance with external hip protectors in nursing homes in Norway.
Inj Prev. 2004 Dec;10(6):344-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005124.
7
Uptake and adherence with soft- and hard-shelled hip protectors in Norwegian nursing homes: a cluster randomised trial.
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jan;19(1):101-11. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0434-9. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
10
Predictors of adherence with the recommended use of hip protectors.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Sep;59(9):M958-61. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.9.m958.

引用本文的文献

1
Vitamin D and hip protectors in osteosarcopenia: a combined hip fracture preventing approach.
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2025 Feb;26(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11154-024-09907-8. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
Autonomy, choice, patient-centered care, and hip protectors: the experience of residents and staff in long-term care.
J Appl Gerontol. 2014 Sep;33(6):690-709. doi: 10.1177/0733464813488658. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of hip fractures in soft protected, hard protected, and unprotected falls.
Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;14(5):306-10. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.018275.
2
Uptake and adherence with soft- and hard-shelled hip protectors in Norwegian nursing homes: a cluster randomised trial.
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Jan;19(1):101-11. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0434-9. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
3
Hip protectors decrease hip fracture risk in elderly nursing home residents: a Bayesian meta-analysis.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;60(4):336-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
4
Dementia--epidemiological considerations, nomenclature, and a tacit consensus definition.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2006 Sep;19(3):129-36. doi: 10.1177/0891988706291081.
5
The quality of care in Norwegian nursing homes.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):177-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00396.x.
6
Effectiveness of hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in elderly people: systematic review.
BMJ. 2006 Mar 11;332(7541):571-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38753.375324.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 2.
9
An in-service evaluation of hip protector use in residential homes.
Age Ageing. 2005 Jan;34(1):52-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh231.
10
Predictors of adherence with the recommended use of hip protectors.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Sep;59(9):M958-61. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.9.m958.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验