Liu Yanjin, Dong Xiaofang, Yang Sen, Wang Aixia, Wang Min
Nursing Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
Neurology Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China. Email:
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26(5):820-828. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.102016.01.
Metoclopramide, a prokinetic agent, has been recommended to reduce incidence of pneumonia, but its efficacy is controversial. Thus, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of metoclopramide for pneumonia in patients fed via nasogastric tube.
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, and OVID were searched from their inception to March 31th 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of metoclopramide against placebo in patients fed via nasogastric tube were identified. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used for quality assessment.
Four trials involving 694 patients fed via nasogastric tube were identified. Compared with placebo, metoclopramide showed no significant effects in reducing pneumonia (n=694; risk ratio [RR]: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.38, p=0.40) or mortality (n=694; RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.11, p=0.44). In two trials using continuous data, metoclopramide significantly delayed the development of nosocomial pneumonia (n=80; weighted mean difference [WMD]: 1.74 days; 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.46 days, p<0.00001). However, in two other trials using dichotomous data, metoclopramide increased the proportion of cases showing early-onset nosocomial pneumonia (n=103; RR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.58, p=0.003). Adverse effects monitoring was reported in one included trial, No significant adverse reactions were noted in this study.
Because of the poor methodological quality and high risk of bias in the included studies, this systematic review revealed no definite conclusion about the application of metoclopramide for the reduction of nosocomial pneumonia. Therefore, more high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are required.
胃复安作为一种促动力药物,已被推荐用于降低肺炎的发生率,但其疗效存在争议。因此,本系统评价旨在评估胃复安对经鼻胃管喂养患者肺炎的有效性。
检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、EMBASE和OVID,检索时间从建库至2015年3月31日。纳入经鼻胃管喂养患者中比较胃复安与安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具进行质量评估。
共纳入4项涉及694例经鼻胃管喂养患者的试验。与安慰剂相比,胃复安在降低肺炎发生率(n = 694;风险比[RR]:0.79;95%置信区间[CI]:0.45至1.38,p = 0.40)或死亡率(n = 694;RR:0.93;95% CI:0.78至1.11,p = 0.44)方面无显著效果。在两项使用连续数据的试验中,胃复安显著延迟了医院获得性肺炎的发生(n = 80;加权均数差[WMD]:1.74天;95% CI:1.03至2.46天,p < 0.00001)。然而,在另外两项使用二分数据的试验中,胃复安增加了早发性医院获得性肺炎的病例比例(n = 1,03;RR:1.32;95% CI:1.10至1.58,p = 0.003)。纳入的一项试验报告了不良反应监测情况,本研究未发现显著不良反应。
由于纳入研究的方法学质量较差且偏倚风险较高,该系统评价未得出关于胃复安应用于降低医院获得性肺炎的确切结论。因此,需要更多样本量更大的高质量研究。