1 Queen Mary University of London, UK.
2 St Bartholomew's Hospital, UK.
J Health Psychol. 2017 Aug;22(9):1113-1117. doi: 10.1177/1359105316688953. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
This article is written in response to the linked editorial by Dr Geraghty about the adaptive Pacing, graded Activity and Cognitive behaviour therapy; a randomised Evaluation (PACE) trial, which we led, implemented and published. The PACE trial compared four treatments for people diagnosed with chronic fatigue syndrome. All participants in the trial received specialist medical care. The trial found that adding cognitive behaviour therapy or graded exercise therapy to specialist medical care was as safe as, and more effective than, adding adaptive pacing therapy or specialist medical care alone. Dr Geraghty has challenged these findings. In this article, we suggest that Dr Geraghty's views are based on misunderstandings and misrepresentations of the PACE trial; these are corrected.
这篇文章是对格里高利博士的相关社论的回应,该社论涉及我们领导、实施和发表的适应性起搏、分级活动和认知行为疗法;一项随机评估(PACE)试验。PACE 试验比较了四种针对慢性疲劳综合征患者的治疗方法。试验中的所有参与者都接受了专业的医疗护理。试验发现,在专业医疗护理的基础上增加认知行为疗法或分级运动疗法与增加适应性起搏疗法或专业医疗护理一样安全且更有效。格里高利博士对这些发现提出了质疑。在本文中,我们认为格里高利博士的观点基于对 PACE 试验的误解和错误陈述;这些错误得到了纠正。