Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎的严重程度指标:一项系统评价。

Severity indices in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review.

作者信息

Toledano Esther, García de Yébenes M Jesús, González-Álvaro Isidoro, Carmona Loreto

机构信息

Servicio de Reumatología. Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.

InMusc, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019 May-Jun;15(3):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify tools designed to evaluate the severity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in order to use them in the investigation of prognostic markers in early arthritis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies that developed/validated an index for RA disease severity. They were analyzed using the COSMIN checklist to assess their methodological quality. In addition, all the variables included were evaluated for their clarity of definition, feasibility and probability of being present in each outcome during the first 2 years of the disease course. To estimate redundancy, variables were grouped by domains.

RESULTS

After reviewing 3,519 articles, 3 studies were included. The first study, the PAS, assessed whether current and lifetime treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or biologics accurately predicted RA severity, as measured by the patient-reported PAS. Treatment variables did not fully distinguish patients in the highest and lowest quartiles of PAS scores. Another severity index, the Claims-Based Index for RA Severity (CIRAS), included the variables age, sex, Felty's syndrome, number of rehabilitation and rheumatology visits, test for inflammatory markers, number of chemistry panels/platelet counts ordered and rheumatoid factor test. The correlation was low (r=0.56) with an index previously validated by the same research group, the RA medical records-based index of severity (RARBIS), with Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein (DAS28-PCR) (r=0.07) and Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MD-HAQ) (r=0.008). Finally, the RARBIS, used to validate the CIRAS, was devised as an RA severity index based on medical records. It includes as domains surgery, radiology, extra-articular manifestations, clinical and laboratory variables, previously chosen by an expert panel. RARBIS had a weak correlation with treatment intensity (r=0.35) and with DAS28 (r=0.41).

CONCLUSION

There is no index to assess the severity of RA based on the course of the first 2 years of follow-up that is adapted to the current strategy of therapeutic management of this disease. Therefore, we believe it is reasonable to develop a new ad hoc severity index for patients with early arthritis.

摘要

目的

识别用于评估类风湿关节炎(RA)患者病情严重程度的工具,以便将其用于早期关节炎预后标志物的研究。

方法

我们对开发/验证RA疾病严重程度指数的研究进行了系统评价。使用COSMIN清单对这些研究进行分析,以评估其方法学质量。此外,对纳入的所有变量的定义清晰度、可行性以及在疾病病程的前2年中出现在每个结局中的可能性进行了评估。为了估计冗余度,按领域对变量进行分组。

结果

在检索3519篇文章后,纳入了3项研究。第一项研究,即患者活动评分(PAS),评估使用改善病情抗风湿药物和/或生物制剂的当前及终生治疗是否能准确预测RA的严重程度,该严重程度通过患者报告的PAS来衡量。治疗变量并未完全区分PAS评分最高和最低四分位数的患者。另一个严重程度指数,基于索赔的RA严重程度指数(CIRAS),包括年龄、性别、费尔蒂综合征、康复和风湿病就诊次数、炎症标志物检测、化学检查/血小板计数次数以及类风湿因子检测等变量。其与先前由同一研究组验证的指数,即基于RA医疗记录严重程度指数(RARBIS)的相关性较低(r = 0.56),与疾病活动评分 - C反应蛋白(DAS28 - PCR)的相关性为(r = 0.07),与多维健康评估问卷(MD - HAQ)的相关性为(r = 0.008)。最后,用于验证CIRAS的RARBIS是作为一种基于医疗记录的RA严重程度指数设计的。它包括手术、放射学、关节外表现、临床和实验室变量等领域,这些领域是先前由一个专家小组选定的。RARBIS与治疗强度的相关性较弱(r = 0.35),与DAS28的相关性为(r = 0.41)。

结论

尚无基于随访前2年病程来评估RA严重程度的指数适用于该病当前的治疗管理策略。因此,我们认为为早期关节炎患者开发一个新的专门严重程度指数是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验