Suppr超能文献

在急性期,非创伤性出血通过REBOA得到控制,随后死亡率因非出血性原因逐渐上升:日本DIRECT - IABO注册研究。

Non-traumatic hemorrhage is controlled with REBOA in acute phase then mortality increases gradually by non-hemorrhagic causes: DIRECT-IABO registry in Japan.

作者信息

Matsumura Y, Matsumoto J, Idoguchi K, Kondo H, Ishida T, Kon Y, Tomita K, Ishida K, Hirose T, Umakoshi K, Funabiki T

机构信息

R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Aug;44(4):503-509. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0829-z. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is now a feasible and less invasive resuscitation procedure. This study aimed to compare the clinical course of trauma and non-trauma patients undergoing REBOA.

METHODS

Patient demographics, etiology, bleeding sites, hemodynamic response, length of critical care, and cause of death were recorded. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between non-trauma and trauma patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was then conducted.

RESULTS

Between August 2011 and December 2015, 142 (36 non-trauma; 106 trauma) cases were analyzed. Non-traumatic etiologies included gastrointestinal bleeding, obstetrics and gynecology-derived events, visceral aneurysm, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and post-abdominal surgery. The abdomen was a common bleeding site (69%), followed by the pelvis or extra-pelvic retroperitoneum. None of the non-trauma patients had multiple bleeding sites, whereas 45% of trauma patients did (P < 0.001). No non-trauma patients required resuscitative thoracotomy compared with 28% of the trauma patients (P < 0.001). Non-trauma patients presented a lower 24-h mortality than trauma patients (19 vs. 51%, P = 0.001). The non-trauma cases demonstrated a gradual but prolonged increased mortality, whereas survival in trauma cases rapidly declined (P = 0.009) with similar hospital mortality (68 vs. 64%). Non-trauma patients who survived for 24 h had 0 ventilator-free days and 0 ICU-free days vs. a median of 19 and 12, respectively, for trauma patients (P = 0.33 and 0.39, respectively). Non-hemorrhagic death was more common in non-trauma vs. trauma patients (83 vs. 33%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-traumatic hemorrhagic shock often resulted from a single bleeding site, and resulted in better 24-h survival than traumatic hemorrhage among Japanese patients who underwent REBOA. However, hospital mortality increased steadily in non-trauma patients affected by non-hemorrhagic causes after a longer period of critical care.

摘要

目的

复苏性血管内主动脉球囊阻断术(REBOA)目前是一种可行且侵入性较小的复苏手术。本研究旨在比较接受REBOA的创伤患者和非创伤患者的临床病程。

方法

记录患者的人口统计学资料、病因、出血部位、血流动力学反应、重症监护时长和死亡原因。比较非创伤患者和创伤患者的特征及结局。然后进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析。

结果

2011年8月至2015年12月期间,共分析了142例病例(36例非创伤患者;106例创伤患者)。非创伤性病因包括胃肠道出血、妇产科相关事件、内脏动脉瘤、腹主动脉瘤和腹部手术后。腹部是常见的出血部位(69%),其次是骨盆或盆腔外腹膜后。非创伤患者均无多处出血部位,而45%的创伤患者有多处出血部位(P<0.001)。与28%的创伤患者相比,非创伤患者均无需进行复苏性开胸手术(P<0.001)。非创伤患者24小时死亡率低于创伤患者(19%对51%,P=0.001)。非创伤病例死亡率呈逐渐上升但持续时间较长的趋势,而创伤病例的生存率迅速下降(P=0.009),两者医院死亡率相似(68%对64%)。存活24小时的非创伤患者无无呼吸机天数和无ICU天数,而创伤患者的中位数分别为19天和12天(P分别为0.33和0.39)。非创伤患者非出血性死亡比创伤患者更常见(83%对33%,P<0.001)。

结论

在接受REBOA的日本患者中,非创伤性失血性休克通常由单一出血部位引起,24小时生存率高于创伤性出血。然而,在经过较长时间的重症监护后,非出血性病因导致的非创伤患者医院死亡率稳步上升。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验