Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于隐静脉搭桥血管成形术(DIVA)试验的原理与设计

Rationale and design of the Drug-Eluting Stents vs Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty (DIVA) Trial.

作者信息

Brilakis Emmanouil S, Banerjee Subhash, Edson Robert, Shunk Kendrick, Goldman Steven, Holmes David R, Bhatt Deepak L, Rao Sunil V, Smith Mark W, Sather Mike, Colling Cindy, Kar Biswajit, Nielsen Lori, Conner Todd, Wagner Todd, Rangan Bavana V, Ventura Beverly, Lu Ying, Holodniy Mark, Shih Mei-Chiung

机构信息

VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas.

Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):946-954. doi: 10.1002/clc.22763. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

Abstract

VA Cooperative Studies Program #571 (DIVA) was designed to evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) for reducing aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass graft (SVG) failure when compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in participants undergoing stenting of de novo SVG lesions. Participants undergoing clinically indicated stenting of de novo SVG lesions were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to DES or BMS. Randomization was stratified by presence/absence of diabetes mellitus and the number of target SVG lesions (1 vs ≥2) within each participating site. At sites that did not routinely administer 12-months of dual antiplatelet therapy after SVG stenting participants without acute coronary syndromes received 1 month of open-label clopidogrel, followed by 11 months of clopidogrel for those assigned to DES and 11 months of placebo for those assigned to BMS. The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of target-vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of other clinical endpoints and the incremental cost-effectiveness of DES relative to BMS. Due to lower-than-anticipated target-vessel failure rates, target enrollment was increased from 519 to 762. The study had randomized 599 participants when recruitment ended in December 2015. The DIVA trial will provide clarity on the appropriate stent type for de novo SVG lesions.

摘要

退伍军人事务部合作研究项目#571(DIVA)旨在评估药物洗脱支架(DES)在降低首次出现的大隐静脉旁路移植血管(SVG)病变患者的主动脉冠状动脉搭桥移植血管(SVG)失败方面的疗效,并与裸金属支架(BMS)进行比较。接受首次出现的SVG病变临床指征支架置入术的参与者按1:1比例随机分为DES组或BMS组。随机分组按每个参与站点内糖尿病的有无以及目标SVG病变的数量(1个与≥2个)进行分层。在SVG支架置入术后不常规给予12个月双联抗血小板治疗的站点,无急性冠状动脉综合征的参与者接受1个月的开放标签氯吡格雷治疗,随后,分配至DES组的参与者接受11个月的氯吡格雷治疗,分配至BMS组的参与者接受11个月的安慰剂治疗。主要终点是12个月时靶血管失败的发生率(定义为心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或靶血管血运重建的复合事件)。次要终点包括其他临床终点的发生率以及DES相对于BMS的增量成本效益。由于靶血管失败率低于预期,目标入组人数从519人增加到762人。2015年12月招募结束时,该研究已随机分配了599名参与者。DIVA试验将明确首次出现的SVG病变适合使用的支架类型。

相似文献

1
Rationale and design of the Drug-Eluting Stents vs Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty (DIVA) Trial.
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):946-954. doi: 10.1002/clc.22763. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
3
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e007045. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007045.
5
Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008494. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: a double-blind, randomised trial.
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):1997-2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30801-8. Epub 2018 May 11.
10
Long term follow-up of drug eluting versus bare metal stents in the treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec 1;82(7):E856-63. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24781. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender differences in the incidence of saphenous vein graft intervention.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Dec 5;19(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03139-2.
2
Short-term outcomes of drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for saphenous vein graft lesions in coronary heart disease.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 6;10:982880. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.982880. eCollection 2023.
3
Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008494. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
4
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for saphenous vein graft interventions.
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(Suppl 9):S1257-S1260. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.50.
5
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein grafts: a double-blind, randomised trial.
Lancet. 2018 May 19;391(10134):1997-2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30801-8. Epub 2018 May 11.

本文引用的文献

2
Choice of Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Saphenous Vein Grafts.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004457.
6
Long-term outcomes with first- vs. second-generation drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 1;87(1):34-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25982. Epub 2015 May 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验