Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Departamento de Pediatria, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Departamento de Fisioterapia, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018 Jul-Aug;94(4):419-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
To compare impulse oscillometry system parameters of normal-weight children with overweight and obese children.
All participants were submitted to the evaluation of lung function (spirometry and impulse oscillometry) following the American Thoracic Society standards. The evaluation of respiratory mechanics was performed using the Jaeger™ MasterScreen™ Impulse Oscillometry System (Erich Jaeger, Germany), three tests were recorded, with acquisition for at least 20seconds.
The study included 81 children (30 in the control group, 21 in the overweight group, and 30 the in obesity group), matched for age and sex. Regarding spirometry data, obesity group showed higher numerical values in relation to the control group; however, there were no significant differences among the three groups. For impulse oscillometry parameters, there was a difference between control group and obesity group for respiratory impedance (p=0.036), resistance at 5hertz (p=0.026), resonant frequency (p=0.029), and reactance area (p=0.014). For the parameters expressed in percentage of predicted, there were differences in resistance at 5 hertz, resonant frequency, and reactance area between control group and obesity group.
Obese children showed increased oscillometry parameters values representative of airway obstruction, compared to normal-weight children. Changes in some oscillometry parameters can already be observed in overweight school-aged children.
比较正常体重儿童、超重儿童和肥胖儿童的脉冲振荡系统参数。
所有参与者均按照美国胸科学会标准接受肺功能(肺活量测定法和脉冲振荡法)评估。使用 Jaeger™ MasterScreen™ Impulse Oscillometry System(德国 Erich Jaeger)评估呼吸力学,记录了三个测试,每个测试的采集时间至少为 20 秒。
该研究纳入了 81 名儿童(对照组 30 名,超重组 21 名,肥胖组 30 名),按年龄和性别进行匹配。在肺活量测定法数据方面,肥胖组的数值高于对照组,但三组之间无显著差异。在脉冲振荡法参数方面,对照组和肥胖组之间的呼吸阻抗(p=0.036)、5 赫兹阻力(p=0.026)、谐振频率(p=0.029)和电抗面积(p=0.014)存在差异。对于用预测百分比表示的参数,对照组和肥胖组之间在 5 赫兹阻力、谐振频率和电抗面积方面存在差异。
与正常体重儿童相比,肥胖儿童的振荡法参数值更高,表明气道阻塞。超重学龄儿童的一些振荡法参数已经发生变化。