Suppr超能文献

淋巴瘤和骨髓瘤患者接受自体外周血造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒再激活。

Cytomegalovirus reactivation in lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

机构信息

Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2017 Oct;95:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus reactivation is often diagnosed in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and therefore could lead to CMV-related disease, involving many organs in these immunocompromised patients. In contrast, few studies investigated CMV reactivation and end-organ disease in patients undergoing Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) since they are considered at low risk for both reactivation and disease.

OBJECTIVES

The primary outcome of the analysis was to understand the difference in incidence of CMV reactivation between MM and Lymphoma patients. Secondary outcomes included the difference between MM and Lymphoma patients when considering the effect of CMV reactivation on transplant related mortality (TRM) overall survival (OS) progression free survival (PFS), risk factors for reactivation, and median time to reactivation.

STUDY DESIGN

In this report, we retrospectively compared the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of CMV reactivation in adult patients with Myeloma (MM) and Lymphoma undergoing ASCT at the American university of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon (AUBMC). A total of 324 consecutive ASCT were performed between January 2005 and March 2016. Serial weekly monitoring for CMV quantification was done using a quantitative PCR, starting from transplantation until the hospital discharge and afterwards based on the clinical symptoms in cases of clinical suspicion of reactivation after discharge from the hospital.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation was 16% (n=53) with a median time of 16 (range, 4-242) days after ASCT. The incidence of reactivation was significantly higher in the MM (22%) and NHL (20%) groups, when compared to the HL (4%) (P=0.001). There was a higher incidence of CMV reactivation according to age (≥50 vs ≤50 years) with higher incidence in the older population 24% vs 10% respectively (p=0.0043). The mean time to CMV reactivation was significantly higher in the NHL group with a mean of 53.7days when compared to the HL and MM groups with mean 19.75days and 12.66 (range, 4-34) days respectively (P=0.003). Twenty-two patients (76%) and three patients (75%) patients required specific antiviral therapy in the MM group and HL groups respectively; which was significantly higher (P<0.001) then the NHL group with 13 (65%) patients requiring specific antiviral therapy. Five patients (1.5%) developed CMV disease at a median of 60days (range, 7-107) post ASCT: there was significant difference in the mean-time to reactivation based on disease type MM versus lymphoma 10 versus 33days (P=0.007). In multivariate analysis, a higher age was associated with an increased risk of CMV reactivation; MM and NHL had higher risk of CMV reactivation when compared to HL, and progressive disease at transplant was associated with increased risk of CMV reactivation. After a median follow-up of 21.5 months (range: 1-125), there was no significant impact on PFS, however there was significant decrease in OS of lymphoma patients who had CMV reactivation when compared to those without CMV reactivation (204 and 112days respectively P=0.045). TRM increased from 1.1% in patients with no CMV reactivation to 13% in patients with CMV reactivation (P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that CMV reactivation is not uncommon in ASCT recipients and may contribute to increase TRM. MM patients may have a higher incidence, of CMV reactivation with more anti-viral treatment requirements when compared to lymphoma patients, especially in older population.

摘要

背景

巨细胞病毒(CMV)的再激活在异基因造血细胞移植受者中经常被诊断出来,因此可能导致 CMV 相关疾病,涉及这些免疫功能低下患者的许多器官。相比之下,由于接受自体外周血造血干细胞移植(ASCT)的患者再激活和疾病的风险都较低,因此很少有研究调查 CMV 再激活和终末器官疾病。

目的

分析的主要结果是了解多发性骨髓瘤(MM)和淋巴瘤患者 CMV 再激活的发生率差异。次要结果包括当考虑 CMV 再激活对移植相关死亡率(TRM)、总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)的影响时,MM 和淋巴瘤患者之间的差异、再激活的危险因素以及再激活的中位时间。

研究设计

在这项报告中,我们回顾性比较了在黎巴嫩贝鲁特美国大学医学中心(AUBMC)接受 ASCT 的 MM 和淋巴瘤成年患者 CMV 再激活的发生率、危险因素和结果。2005 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月期间共进行了 324 例连续 ASCT。从移植开始,直到患者出院,每周使用定量 PCR 进行一次 CMV 定量监测,之后根据出院后临床怀疑再激活的症状进行监测。

结果

CMV 再激活的累积发生率为 16%(n=53),再激活后中位时间为 16 天(范围 4-242 天)。与 HL(4%)相比,MM(22%)和 NHL(20%)组的再激活发生率显著更高(P=0.001)。根据年龄(≥50 岁与≤50 岁),CMV 再激活的发生率更高,老年患者的发生率分别为 24%和 10%(p=0.0043)。NHL 组 CMV 再激活的平均时间明显长于 HL 和 MM 组,分别为 53.7 天、19.75 天和 12.66 天(范围 4-34 天)(P=0.003)。22 名(76%)和 3 名(75%)MM 组和 HL 组患者需要特定的抗病毒治疗;显著高于 NHL 组(65%)的 13 名患者需要特定的抗病毒治疗(P<0.001)。5 名患者(1.5%)在移植后 60 天(范围 7-107 天)出现 CMV 疾病:根据疾病类型,MM 与淋巴瘤患者之间的再激活平均时间存在显著差异,分别为 10 天和 33 天(P=0.007)。多变量分析显示,年龄较大与 CMV 再激活的风险增加相关;与 HL 相比,MM 和 NHL 发生 CMV 再激活的风险更高,移植时进展性疾病与 CMV 再激活的风险增加相关。在中位随访 21.5 个月(范围 1-125)后,PFS 没有显著影响,但与没有 CMV 再激活的患者相比,CMV 再激活的淋巴瘤患者的 OS 显著降低(分别为 204 天和 112 天,P=0.045)。TRM 从无 CMV 再激活患者的 1.1%增加到有 CMV 再激活患者的 13%(P=0.003)。

结论

我们的数据表明,CMV 再激活在 ASCT 受者中并不罕见,可能导致 TRM 增加。与淋巴瘤患者相比,MM 患者可能具有更高的 CMV 再激活发生率,且需要更多的抗病毒治疗,尤其是在老年患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验