• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对痴呆症患者照料者的在线社会支持干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Effectiveness of an online social support intervention for caregivers of people with dementia: the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Dam Alieske E H, de Vugt Marjolein E, van Boxtel Martin P J, Verhey Frans R J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience/Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Dr. Tanslaan 12 (level 3 | room 3G3.058), P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Aug 29;18(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y
PMID:28851406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5575867/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) face burden, feelings of loneliness, and social isolation. Previous studies have shown promising effects of online e-health interventions. Using social media may facilitate support for dementia caregiver networks. In an iterative step-wise approach, a social support tool entitled "Inlife" was developed. This paper describes the design of a study evaluating the effects of Inlife and its process characteristics.

METHODS

A mixed-method, randomised controlled trial with 122 caregivers of PwD will be conducted. Participants will be assigned to either the Inlife social support intervention or a waiting-list control group. After 16 weeks, the control group will obtain access to the Inlife environment. Data will be collected at baseline (T) and at 8-week (T), 16-week (T) and 42-week follow up (T). The 16-week follow-up assessment (T) is the primary endpoint to evaluate the results on the primary and secondary outcomes, measured by self-reported questionnaires. The primary outcomes include feelings of caregiver competence and perceived social support. The secondary outcomes include received support, feelings of loneliness, psychological complaints (e.g., anxiety, stress), and quality of life. A process evaluation, including semi-structured interviews, will be conducted to examine the internal and external validity of the intervention.

DISCUSSION

Using a mixed-method design, our study will provide valuable insights into the usability, effectiveness, and factors related to implementation of the Inlife intervention. Our study results will indicate whether Inlife could be a valuable social support resource in future routine dementia care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch trial register, NTR6131 . Registered on 20 October 2016.

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者(PwD)的照料者面临负担、孤独感和社会隔离。先前的研究表明在线电子健康干预具有显著效果。使用社交媒体可能有助于为痴呆症照料者网络提供支持。通过迭代逐步的方法,开发了一种名为“Inlife”的社会支持工具。本文描述了一项评估Inlife效果及其过程特征的研究设计。

方法

将对122名痴呆症患者的照料者进行一项混合方法的随机对照试验。参与者将被分配到Inlife社会支持干预组或等待名单对照组。16周后,对照组将获得使用Inlife环境的权限。数据将在基线(T0)、8周(T1)、16周(T2)和42周随访(T3)时收集。16周的随访评估(T2)是评估主要和次要结局结果的主要终点,通过自我报告问卷进行测量。主要结局包括照料者能力感和感知到的社会支持。次要结局包括获得的支持、孤独感、心理问题(如焦虑、压力)和生活质量。将进行包括半结构化访谈在内的过程评估,以检验干预的内部和外部有效性。

讨论

采用混合方法设计,我们的研究将为Inlife干预的可用性、有效性以及与实施相关的因素提供有价值的见解。我们的研究结果将表明Inlife在未来常规痴呆症护理中是否可能成为一种有价值的社会支持资源。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册中心,NTR6131。于2016年10月20日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66eb/5575867/c65d38cd15be/13063_2017_2097_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66eb/5575867/c65d38cd15be/13063_2017_2097_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66eb/5575867/c65d38cd15be/13063_2017_2097_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of an online social support intervention for caregivers of people with dementia: the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一项针对痴呆症患者照料者的在线社会支持干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 29;18(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y.
2
Lessons Learned From an Effectiveness Evaluation of Inlife, a Web-Based Social Support Intervention for Caregivers of People With Dementia: Randomized Controlled Trial.从“Inlife”有效性评估中吸取的经验教训,Inlife是一项针对痴呆症患者照料者的基于网络的社会支持干预措施:随机对照试验。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Dec 7;5(4):e38656. doi: 10.2196/38656.
3
Effectiveness of the blended care self-management program "Partner in Balance" for early-stage dementia caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.混合式照护自我管理项目“平衡伙伴”对早期痴呆症照料者的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 May 4;17(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1351-z.
4
Development and feasibility of Inlife: A pilot study of an online social support intervention for informal caregivers of people with dementia.Inlife的开发与可行性:一项针对痴呆症患者非正式照料者的在线社会支持干预试点研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0183386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183386. eCollection 2017.
5
The TECH@HOME study, a technological intervention to reduce caregiver burden for informal caregivers of people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.TECH@HOME研究:一项减轻痴呆症患者非正式照料者负担的技术干预措施——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 9;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1796-8.
6
Process evaluation of a social support platform 'Inlife' for caregivers of people with dementia.针对痴呆症患者照料者的社交支持平台“Inlife”的过程评估。
Internet Interv. 2018 Nov 3;15:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.09.002. eCollection 2019 Mar.
7
Dealing with daily challenges in dementia (deal-id study): effectiveness of the experience sampling method intervention 'Partner in Sight' for spousal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a randomized controlled trial.应对痴呆症的日常挑战(DEAL-ID研究):经验抽样方法干预措施“目光伙伴”对痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的有效性:一项随机对照试验的设计
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 11;16:136. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0834-5.
8
Online training and support program (iSupport) for informal dementia caregivers: protocol for an intervention study in Portugal.在线培训和支持计划(iSupport)为非正式痴呆症照顾者提供支持:葡萄牙干预研究的方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1364-z.
9
Feasibility and effectiveness of a telephone-based social support intervention for informal caregivers of people with dementia: Study protocol of the TALKING TIME project.一项针对痴呆症患者非正式照料者的电话社交支持干预措施的可行性与有效性:TALKING TIME项目研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2231-2.
10
Relieving distressed caregivers (ReDiCare study): study protocol of a randomized pragmatic trial.缓解困境中的照护者(ReDiCare 研究):一项随机实用试验的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01941-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Culturally Adapting the World Health Organization Digital Intervention for Family Caregivers of People With Dementia (iSupport): Community-Based Participatory Approach.对世界卫生组织针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的数字干预措施(iSupport)进行文化调适:基于社区的参与式方法
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 24;8:e46941. doi: 10.2196/46941.
2
Digital interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness in older adults: An evidence and gap map.减少老年人社会隔离和孤独感的数字干预措施:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;19(4):e1369. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1369. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Psychometric properties of Psychosocial Inventory for Caregivers (PIC) scale.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and feasibility of Inlife: A pilot study of an online social support intervention for informal caregivers of people with dementia.Inlife的开发与可行性:一项针对痴呆症患者非正式照料者的在线社会支持干预试点研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0183386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183386. eCollection 2017.
2
A mismatch between supply and demand of social support in dementia care: a qualitative study on the perspectives of spousal caregivers and their social network members.痴呆症护理中社会支持的供需不匹配:配偶照顾者及其社会网络成员观点的定性研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Jun;30(6):881-892. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000898. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
3
照顾者心理社会量表(PIC)的心理测量学特性。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;65(3):334-344. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_407_22. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
4
Effects of family-based dignity intervention and expressive writing on anticipatory grief in family caregivers of patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial.基于家庭的尊严干预和表达性写作对癌症患者家庭照顾者预期悲伤的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04715-x.
5
A Web-Based Decision Aid for Caregivers of Persons With Dementia With Firearm Access (Safe at Home Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对有枪支接触风险的痴呆症患者照料者的基于网络的决策辅助工具(居家安全研究):一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 31;12:e43702. doi: 10.2196/43702.
6
Lessons Learned From an Effectiveness Evaluation of Inlife, a Web-Based Social Support Intervention for Caregivers of People With Dementia: Randomized Controlled Trial.从“Inlife”有效性评估中吸取的经验教训,Inlife是一项针对痴呆症患者照料者的基于网络的社会支持干预措施:随机对照试验。
JMIR Aging. 2022 Dec 7;5(4):e38656. doi: 10.2196/38656.
7
Web-Based Technologies to Support Carers of People Living With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.支持痴呆症患者照料者的基于网络的技术:一项混合方法阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 19;11(5):e33023. doi: 10.2196/33023.
8
Effect of "Mehrpishegan" web-based support group on depression, anxiety, and stress among elderly informal caregivers: a protocol for a randomized-controlled trial.基于网络的“Mehrpishegan”支持小组对老年非正式照护者抑郁、焦虑和压力的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 May 17;23(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06351-4.
9
Smartphone applications for informal caregivers of chronically ill patients: a scoping review.适用于慢性病患者非正式照护者的智能手机应用程序:一项范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Mar 21;5(1):33. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00567-z.
10
Barriers to identifying residents with dementia for embedded pragmatic trials: A call to action.针对嵌入式实用试验识别痴呆症住院患者的障碍:行动呼吁。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Feb;70(2):638-641. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17539. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
Technologies to Support Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia: A Position Paper on Issues Regarding Development, Usability, Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness, Deployment, and Ethics.
支持社区痴呆症患者的技术:关于开发、可用性、有效性和成本效益、部署及伦理问题的立场文件
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jan 16;4(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/rehab.6376.
4
Social health in dementia. Towards a positive dementia discourse.痴呆症中的社会健康。迈向积极的痴呆症话语。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1262822.
5
Social health and dementia: a European consensus on the operationalization of the concept and directions for research and practice.社会健康与痴呆症:关于该概念的操作化以及研究与实践方向的欧洲共识。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):4-17. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1254596. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Access to timely formal dementia care in Europe: protocol of the Actifcare (ACcess to Timely Formal Care) study.欧洲获得及时的正式痴呆症护理:Actifcare(及时获得正式护理)研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 23;16(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1672-3.
7
Dealing with daily challenges in dementia (deal-id study): effectiveness of the experience sampling method intervention 'Partner in Sight' for spousal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a randomized controlled trial.应对痴呆症的日常挑战(DEAL-ID研究):经验抽样方法干预措施“目光伙伴”对痴呆症患者配偶照顾者的有效性:一项随机对照试验的设计
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 11;16:136. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0834-5.
8
Development and Initial Evaluation of the Web-Based Self-Management Program "Partner in Balance" for Family Caregivers of People With Early Stage Dementia: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.基于网络的早期痴呆症患者家庭照顾者自我管理项目“平衡伙伴”的开发与初步评估:一项探索性混合方法研究
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Mar 1;5(1):e33. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5142.
9
A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: Are they doing what they promise?对痴呆症患者照料者社会支持干预措施的系统评价:它们是否兑现了承诺?
Maturitas. 2016 Mar;85:117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
10
Qualitative study on needs and wishes of early-stage dementia caregivers: the paradox between needing and accepting help.早期痴呆症照料者需求与愿望的定性研究:需要帮助与接受帮助之间的矛盾
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Jun;27(6):927-36. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002804. Epub 2015 Jan 8.