Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
School of Pharmacy, University Reading, Reading, RG6 6UA, UK.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Aug 29;27(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0049-3.
'Finding the missing millions' with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease became part of the Department of Health strategy for England in 2010. Targeted case-finding within primary care is one potential pro-active strategy, but currently little is known about the views of healthcare professionals on this approach. In this study, 36 healthcare professionals (12 GPs, 14 nurses, and 10 practice managers) from 34 UK practices participated in semi-structured telephone interviews about targeted case-finding. Interviews followed an interview guide, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed using 'Framework Approach'. Most of those interviewed practiced opportunistic case-finding. The main perceived barriers to wider case-finding programmes were the resource implications associated with running such programmes and identifying more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Financial incentives, support from specialist clinicians, and comprehensive guidance were viewed as facilitators. While targeted case-finding is conceptually accepted by primary care staff, scepticism surrounding (1) the value of identifying those with mild disease and (2) the availability of effective targeted case-finding methods, may lead some to favour an opportunistic approach. Key concerns were a lack of unequivocal evidence for the relative benefits vs. disadvantages of diagnosing patients earlier, and resource constraints in an already over-burdened system. Barriers to practical implementation of case-finding studies may be addressed with financial, human and educational resources, such as additional staff to undertake searches and perform spirometry tests, and practical and educational support from specialist teams.
SUPPORT NEEDED TO IDENTIFY THOSE UNDIAGNOSED: Additional staff and resources would facilitate targeted searches for patients showing symptoms of early-stage chronic lung disease. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) costs the UK economy billions of pounds each year, yet disparate symptoms mean patients aren't always diagnosed in the early, treatable stages of the disease. Recent guidelines suggest introducing 'targeted case-finding', where symptomatic patients with known risk factors are identified and approached for testing by doctors. Rachael Summers and colleagues at the University of Southampton analyzed the opinions of healthcare professionals on implementing targeted case-finding in primary care. While most of the 36 professionals interviewed agreed that diagnosing COPD earlier had clear benefits, concerns were raised regarding negative patient responses and increased stress for patients, alongside the added strain on already stretched resources. Employing independent staff and enhancing resources may facilitate such a program.
未确诊的“寻找数百万例患者”:2010 年,英国卫生部将“寻找未确诊的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者”纳入战略计划。在初级保健中进行目标性病例发现是一种潜在的主动策略,但目前人们对医疗保健专业人员对此方法的看法知之甚少。在这项研究中,来自 34 家英国实践的 36 名医疗保健专业人员(12 名全科医生,14 名护士和 10 名实践经理)参加了关于目标性病例发现的半结构式电话访谈。访谈遵循访谈指南,进行了音频记录、逐字转录、编码,并使用“框架方法”进行了分析。大多数接受访谈的人都进行了机会性病例发现。扩大病例发现计划的主要障碍是与运行此类计划和识别更多慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者相关的资源问题。经济激励措施、专家临床医生的支持以及全面的指导被视为促进因素。虽然初级保健人员从概念上接受了目标性病例发现,但对(1)识别轻度疾病患者的价值和(2)有效目标性病例发现方法的可用性存在怀疑,这可能导致一些人赞成机会性方法。主要关注的问题是,缺乏明确的证据表明早期诊断患者的相对益处和弊端,以及在已经负担过重的系统中资源限制。通过财务、人力和教育资源(例如,增加承担搜索和进行肺活量测试的人员)以及来自专家团队的实际和教育支持,可以解决病例发现研究实际实施的障碍。