Schubert Oliver, Nold Ephraim, Obermeier Matthias, Erdelt Kurt, Stimmelmayr Michael, Beuer Florian
Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(3):245-262.
Computer-aided technologies can help to minimize clinical complications of zirconia-based restorations such as veneering porcelain fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate different veneering approaches for zirconia single crowns regarding contact wear, fracture strength, and failure mode.
Six different types of computer-aided design (CAD) crowns were manufactured and conventionally cemented on 10 metal dies each: three groups with a zirconia framework and a CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering cap ("digital veneering system": DVS, CAD-on, Infix CAD), zirconia-based crowns with pressed veneering caps (Infix Press), zirconia framework containing the dentin layer with only the incisal enamel material added (dentin-core), and conventional substructure with powder buildup veneering porcelain (layering technique). All specimens were submitted to artificial aging (120,000 mechanical cycles, 50 N load, 0.7-mm sliding movement, 320 thermocycles). After contact wear was measured with a laser scanning system, fracture resistance and failure mode were examined using a universal testing machine and a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analysis was performed at a significance level of 5%.
No statistical difference was revealed regarding the contact wear of the restorations (P = 0.171; ANOVA). No significant difference was found regarding the fracture resistance of the crowns (P = 0.112; ANOVA). Failure analysis revealed three different failure patterns: cohesive veneering fracture, adhesive delamination, and total fracture, with a characteristic distribution between the groups.
All tested specimens survived artificial aging and exhibited clinically acceptable wear resistance and fracture resistance. Digital veneering techniques offer a promising, time- and cost-effective manufacturing process for all-ceramic restorations and may usefully complement the digital workflow.
计算机辅助技术有助于将基于氧化锆的修复体的临床并发症(如贴面瓷折裂)降至最低。本研究的目的是评估氧化锆单冠的不同贴面方法在接触磨损、断裂强度和失效模式方面的情况。
制作六种不同类型的计算机辅助设计(CAD)牙冠,并分别常规粘结在10个金属代型上:三组采用氧化锆基底冠和计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)制作的贴面帽(“数字贴面系统”:DVS、CAD-on、Infix CAD),采用压制贴面帽的氧化锆基牙冠(Infix Press),含牙本质层仅添加切端釉质材料的氧化锆基底冠(牙本质核),以及采用粉末堆积贴面瓷的传统基底结构(分层技术)。所有标本均进行人工老化(120,000次机械循环、50 N载荷、0.7 mm滑动位移、320次热循环)。使用激光扫描系统测量接触磨损后,通过万能试验机和扫描电子显微镜检测抗折性和失效模式。在5%的显著性水平上进行统计分析。
修复体的接触磨损方面未显示出统计学差异(P = 0.171;方差分析)。牙冠的抗折性方面未发现显著差异(P = 0.112;方差分析)。失效分析揭示了三种不同的失效模式:粘结性贴面折裂、粘结性分层和完全折裂,在各组之间有特征性分布。
所有测试标本均通过人工老化,表现出临床上可接受的耐磨性和抗折性。数字贴面技术为全瓷修复体提供了一种有前景、省时且经济高效的制造工艺,可有效补充数字工作流程。