Rajabi Mohammad Taher, Gholipour Farshad, Ramezani Koosha, Hosseini Seyedeh Simindokht, Rajabi Mohammad Bagher, Tabatabaie Seyed Ziaeddin
a Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital , Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran.
b Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine , Department of Ophthalmology , Indianapolis , Indiana , USA.
Orbit. 2018 Feb;37(1):53-58. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1363786. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of orbital vector and other biometric parameters (i.e. axial globe length, axial globe projection) on the development of involutional entropion or ectropion.
In this cross-sectional study, 167 eyes from 132 patients were included. Of these eyes, 128 had involutional entropion and 39 had involutional ectropion, all of lower lids. The axial globe projection was measured using Hertel exophthalmometry; axial globe length was assessed by A-mode ultrasound; and orbital vector was determined clinically. Patient-specific categorical variables and continuous variables were compared using the chi-square test and the two-sided t test, respectively. Correlations were derived using the Pearson correlation.
The percentage of females was 59% and 33.3% in the entropion group and in the ectropion group, respectively. A significant association was found between the gender and type of eyelid malposition (p = 0.015). Exophthalmometry reading was greater in the ectropion group than in the entropion group (17.7 ± 2.5 versus 10.8 ± 3.7 mm, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between axial globe length and exophthalmometry reading. Positive orbital vectors were observed in 87.5% of eyelids with involutional entropion. Negative orbital vectors were observed in 92.3% of eyelids with involutional ectropion (p < 0.001). Patients with negative orbital vectors showed greater axial globe projection than patients with positive orbital vectors (18.0 ± 2.1 versus 10.6 ± 3.5 mm, respectively; p < 0.001).
There is an association between orbital vector measurement and involutional entropion and ectropion. Measuring the orbital vector may help predict the development of these lid malpositions.
本研究旨在评估眼眶向量及其他生物测量参数(即眼轴长度、眼球轴向突出度)对退行性睑内翻或睑外翻发生发展的影响。
在这项横断面研究中,纳入了132例患者的167只眼。其中,128只眼患有退行性睑内翻,39只眼患有退行性睑外翻,均为下睑。使用Hertel眼球突出计测量眼球轴向突出度;通过A型超声评估眼轴长度;并通过临床检查确定眼眶向量。分别使用卡方检验和双侧t检验比较患者特定的分类变量和连续变量。采用Pearson相关性分析得出相关性。
睑内翻组和睑外翻组的女性比例分别为59%和33.3%。发现性别与眼睑错位类型之间存在显著关联(p = 0.015)。睑外翻组的眼球突出计读数高于睑内翻组(分别为17.7±2.5与10.8±3.7mm;p < 0.001)。眼轴长度与眼球突出计读数之间无显著相关性。在87.5%的退行性睑内翻眼睑中观察到正眼眶向量。在92.3%的退行性睑外翻眼睑中观察到负眼眶向量(p < 0.001)。负眼眶向量的患者比正眼眶向量的患者表现出更大的眼球轴向突出度(分别为18.0±2.1与10.6±3.5mm;p < 0.001)。
眼眶向量测量与退行性睑内翻和睑外翻之间存在关联。测量眼眶向量可能有助于预测这些眼睑错位的发生发展。