• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在有和无心功能障碍的脓毒性休克患者中,第 24 小时内中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差的预后意义。

Prognostic significance of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference during the first 24 hours of septic shock in patients with and without impaired cardiac function.

机构信息

Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital Centre, Orléans, France.

Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital, Tours, France.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):239-248. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex131.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aex131
PMID:28854537
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (cv-art CO 2 gap) during septic shock in patients with and without impaired cardiac function.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in 10 French intensive care units. Patients suffering from septic shock were assigned to the impaired cardiac function group ('cardiac group', n =123) if they had atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% at study entry and to the non-cardiac group ( n =240) otherwise.

RESULTS

Central venous and arterial blood gases were sampled every 6 h during the first 24 h to calculate cv-art CO 2 gap. Patients in the cardiac group had a higher cv-art CO 2 gap [at study entry and 6 and 12 h (all P <0.02)] than the non-cardiac group. Patients in the cardiac group with a cv-art CO 2 gap >0.9 kPa at 12 h had a higher risk of day 28 mortality (hazard ratio=3.18; P =0.0049). Among the 59 patients in the cardiac group with mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mm Hg, central venous pressure (CVP) ≥8 mm Hg and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) ≥70% at 12 h, those with a high cv-art CO 2 gap (>0.9 kPa; n =19) had a higher day 28 mortality (37% vs. 13%; P =0.042). In the non-cardiac group, a high cv-art CO 2 gap was not linked to a higher risk of day 28 death, whatever the threshold value of the cv-art CO 2 gap.

CONCLUSION

Patients with septic shock and with AF and/or low LVEF were more prone to a persistent high cv-art CO 2 gap, even when initial resuscitation succeeded in normalizing MAP, CVP, and ScvO 2 . In these patients, a persistent high cv-art CO 2 gap at 12 h was significantly associated with higher day 28 mortality.

摘要

目的

探讨有和无心功能障碍的脓毒性休克患者中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差(cv-art CO 2 差)的预后意义。

方法

我们在法国 10 个重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。在研究开始时患有心房颤动(AF)和/或左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%的患者被分配到心功能障碍组(“心功能障碍组”,n=123),否则被分配到无心功能障碍组(n=240)。

结果

在最初 24 小时内,每 6 小时采集中心静脉和动脉血气样本来计算 cv-art CO 2 差。心功能障碍组患者的 cv-art CO 2 差[在研究开始时和 6 小时及 12 小时(均 P <0.02)]高于无心功能障碍组。心功能障碍组患者在 12 小时 cv-art CO 2 差>0.9 kPa 的患者,28 天死亡率较高(风险比=3.18;P=0.0049)。在有心功能障碍组 59 例患者中,平均动脉压(MAP)≥65mmHg,中心静脉压(CVP)≥8mmHg,中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO 2 )≥70%,在 12 小时时,那些 cv-art CO 2 差较高(>0.9 kPa;n=19)的患者,28 天死亡率较高(37% vs. 13%;P=0.042)。在无心功能障碍组中,无论 cv-art CO 2 差的阈值如何,高 cv-art CO 2 差与 28 天死亡风险的增加无关。

结论

患有脓毒性休克、心房颤动和/或低左心室射血分数的患者更容易持续存在高 cv-art CO 2 差,即使初始复苏成功地使 MAP、CVP 和 ScvO 2 正常化。在这些患者中,12 小时时持续的高 cv-art CO 2 差与较高的 28 天死亡率显著相关。

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference during the first 24 hours of septic shock in patients with and without impaired cardiac function.在有和无心功能障碍的脓毒性休克患者中,第 24 小时内中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差的预后意义。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):239-248. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex131.
2
[Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference in critically ill pediatric patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克危重症患儿的中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳差值]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Dec;52(12):918-22.
3
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference: an additional target for goal-directed therapy in septic shock?中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差:脓毒性休克目标导向治疗的额外靶点?
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Dec;34(12):2218-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1199-0. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
4
[Assessment of central venous-to-arterial CO(2) difference during early goal-directed therapy in patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克患者早期目标导向治疗期间中心静脉-动脉血二氧化碳分压差的评估]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;50(10):918-22.
5
[Prognostic value of arterial lactate combined with central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference to arterial-to-central venous oxygen content difference ratio in septic shock patients].动脉血乳酸联合中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳分压差与动脉血与中心静脉血氧含量差比值对脓毒症休克患者的预后价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jan;32(1):39-43. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20191226-00007.
6
[The evaluation value of severity and prognosis of septic shock patients based on the arterial-to-venous carbon dioxide difference].基于动静脉二氧化碳分压差对感染性休克患者严重程度及预后的评估价值
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;51(6):437-40.
7
Central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference combined with arterial-to-venous oxygen content difference is associated with lactate evolution in the hemodynamic resuscitation process in early septic shock.中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差联合动脉血与静脉血氧含量差与早期脓毒性休克血流动力学复苏过程中乳酸的变化相关。
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 28;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0858-0.
8
Relationship Analysis of Central Venous-to-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference and Cardiac Index for Septic Shock.中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差与感染性休克心指数的关系分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 19;9(1):8822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45252-6.
9
[Prognostic value of differences between peripheral arterial and venous blood gas analysis in patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克患者外周动脉血与静脉血气分析差异的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Aug;30(8):722-726. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.08.002.
10
[Improvement effect of early goal-directed therapy on the prognosis in patients with septic shock].早期目标导向治疗对感染性休克患者预后的改善作用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):899-905.

引用本文的文献

1
CO Gap Alone Is Not a Prognostic Marker for 28-Day Survival of Patients Undergoing a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.单纯的二氧化碳分压差值并非经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者28天生存率的预后标志物。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 29;14(13):4612. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134612.
2
Venoarterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide Difference: Let's Trend It!静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差值:让我们追踪它!
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr;28(4):323-325. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24695.
3
Venous Minus Arterial Carbon Dioxide Gradients in the Monitoring of Tissue Perfusion and Oxygenation: A Narrative Review.
静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差在组织灌注和氧合监测中的作用:一篇叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 6;59(7):1262. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071262.
4
Use of CO-Derived Variables in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications.一氧化碳衍生变量在心脏重症监护病房的应用:病理生理学及临床意义
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 May 10;10(5):208. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10050208.
5
Ratio of venous-to-arterial PCO to arteriovenous oxygen content difference during regional ischemic or hypoxic hypoxia.局部缺血或缺氧性低氧时静脉-动脉 PCO 比值与动静脉氧含量差的比值。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89703-5.
6
Changes in central venous to arterial carbon dioxide gap (PCO gap) in response to acute changes in ventilation.中心静脉至动脉二氧化碳分压差(PCO gap)在急性通气变化时的变化。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000886.
7
Prognostic value of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference in patients with bloodstream infection.中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差对血流感染患者的预后价值。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Jan 1;18(4):929-935. doi: 10.7150/ijms.51447. eCollection 2021.
8
Monitoring Microcirculation: Utility and Barriers - A Point-of-View Review.监测微循环:效用与障碍——观点综述。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020 Dec 31;16:577-589. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S242635. eCollection 2020.
9
Central venous minus arterial carbon dioxide pressure to arterial minus central venous oxygen content ratio as an indicator of tissue oxygenation: a narrative review.中心静脉血与动脉血二氧化碳分压差值与动脉血与中心静脉血氧含量比值作为组织氧合指标的叙述性综述
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Mar;32(1):115-122. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200017. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Value of Central Venous to Arterial CO Difference after Early Goal-directed Therapy in Septic Shock Patients.早期目标导向治疗后脓毒症休克患者中心静脉与动脉血二氧化碳分压差的价值
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;23(10):449-453. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23262.