Kfoury Nicole, Scott Eric, Orians Colin, Robbat Albert
Department of Chemistry and ‡Department of Biology, Tufts University , Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States.
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Sep 27;65(38):8501-8509. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02847. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
Plants produce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with diverse structures and functions, which change in response to environmental stimuli and have important consequences for interactions with other organisms. To understand these changes, in situ sampling is necessary. In contrast to dynamic headspace (DHS), which is the most often employed method, direct contact sampling employing a magnetic stir bar held in place by a magnet eliminates artifacts produced by enclosing plant materials in glass or plastic chambers. Direct-contact sorptive extraction (DCSE) using polydimethylsiloxane coated stir bars (Twisters) coated stir bars is more sensitive than DHS, captures a wider range of compounds, minimizes VOC collection from neighboring plants, and distinguishes the effects of herbivory in controlled and field conditions. Because DCSE is relatively inexpensive and simple to employ, scalability of field trials can be expanded concomitant with increased sample replication. The sensitivity of DCSE combined with the spectral deconvolution data analysis software makes the two ideal for comprehensive, in situ profiling of plant volatiles.
植物会产生具有多种结构和功能的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs),这些化合物会根据环境刺激而发生变化,并对与其他生物的相互作用产生重要影响。为了了解这些变化,原位采样是必要的。与最常用的动态顶空(DHS)方法不同,使用由磁铁固定的磁力搅拌棒进行直接接触采样可消除将植物材料封闭在玻璃或塑料腔室中产生的假象。使用聚二甲基硅氧烷涂层搅拌棒(Twisters)的直接接触吸附萃取(DCSE)比DHS更灵敏,能捕获更广泛的化合物,将来自邻近植物的VOC收集量降至最低,并能在受控和田间条件下区分食草作用的影响。由于DCSE相对便宜且易于使用,因此随着样本重复次数的增加,田间试验的可扩展性可以扩大。DCSE的灵敏度与光谱去卷积数据分析软件相结合,使二者成为植物挥发物综合原位分析的理想选择。