From the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):639-643. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002445.
Appropriate supervision has been shown to reduce medical errors in anesthesiology residents and other trainees across various specialties. Nonetheless, supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows has yet to be evaluated. The main objective of this survey investigation was to evaluate supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. We hypothesized that there was an indirect association between perceived quality of faculty supervision of pediatric anesthesiology fellow trainees and the frequency of medical errors reported.
A survey of pediatric fellows from 53 pediatric anesthesiology fellowship programs in the United States was performed. The primary outcome was the frequency of self-reported errors by fellows, and the primary independent variable was supervision scores. Questions also assessed barriers for effective faculty supervision.
One hundred seventy-six pediatric anesthesiology fellows were invited to participate, and 104 (59%) responded to the survey. Nine of 103 (9%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-16%) respondents reported performing procedures, on >1 occasion, for which they were not properly trained for. Thirteen of 101 (13%, 95% CI, 7%-21%) reported making >1 mistake with negative consequence to patients, and 23 of 104 (22%, 95% CI, 15%-31%) reported >1 medication error in the last year. There were no differences in median (interquartile range) supervision scores between fellows who reported >1 medication error compared to those reporting ≤1 errors (3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 3.4 [3.1-3.7]; median difference, 0; 99% CI, -0.3 to 0.3; P = .96). Similarly, there were no differences in those who reported >1 mistake with negative patient consequences, 3.3 (3.0-3.7), compared with those who did not report mistakes with negative patient consequences (3.4 [3.3-3.7]; median difference, 0.1; 99% CI, -0.2 to 0.6; P = .35).
We detected a high rate of self-reported medication errors in pediatric anesthesiology fellows in the United States. Interestingly, fellows' perception of quality of faculty supervision was not associated with the frequency of reported errors. The current results with a narrow CI suggest the need to evaluate other potential factors that can be associated with the high frequency of reported errors by pediatric fellows (eg, fatigue, burnout). The identification of factors that lead to medical errors by pediatric anesthesiology fellows should be a main research priority to improve both trainee education and best practices of pediatric anesthesia.
适当的监督已被证明可以减少麻醉学住院医师和其他专业培训生的医疗失误。尽管如此,儿科麻醉学研究员的监督仍有待评估。本次调查研究的主要目的是评估美国儿科麻醉学研究员的监督情况。我们假设,教员对儿科麻醉学研究员的监督质量感知与报告的医疗失误频率之间存在间接关联。
对美国 53 个儿科麻醉学住院医师培训计划的儿科研究员进行了调查。主要结果是研究员自我报告的错误频率,主要的独立变量是监督评分。问题还评估了有效教员监督的障碍。
邀请了 176 名儿科麻醉学研究员参加,其中 104 名(59%)对调查做出了回应。在 103 名受访者中,有 9 名(9%,95%置信区间 [CI],4%-16%)报告说,他们曾多次进行未经适当培训的手术。在 101 名受访者中,有 13 名(13%,95% CI,7%-21%)报告说,他们曾对患者造成 1 次以上的错误,导致负面后果,而在 104 名受访者中,有 23 名(22%,95% CI,15%-31%)报告说,在过去一年中,他们曾有 1 次以上的用药错误。在报告了 1 次以上用药错误的研究员和报告了 1 次以下用药错误的研究员之间,中位数(四分位距)的监督评分没有差异(3.4 [3.0-3.7] vs 3.4 [3.1-3.7];中位数差值,0;99%CI,-0.3 至 0.3;P =.96)。同样,在报告了对患者有负面后果的 1 次以上错误的研究员和未报告对患者有负面后果的错误的研究员之间,中位数(四分位距)的监督评分也没有差异(3.3 [3.0-3.7],与 3.4 [3.3-3.7];中位数差值,0.1;99%CI,-0.2 至 0.6;P =.35)。
我们在美国儿科麻醉学研究员中发现了高比例的自我报告用药错误。有趣的是,研究员对教员监督质量的感知与报告错误的频率无关。目前的结果置信区间较窄,表明需要评估其他可能与儿科研究员报告的高频率错误相关的潜在因素(例如疲劳、倦怠)。确定导致儿科麻醉学研究员发生医疗失误的因素应该是提高培训生教育和儿科麻醉最佳实践的主要研究重点。