Suppr超能文献

关节镜下盘状外侧半月板部分切除与全切除治疗有症状盘状半月板的短期和长期随访的系统评价。

Saucerization Versus Complete Resection of a Symptomatic Discoid Lateral Meniscus at Short- and Long-term Follow-up: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;33(9):1733-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.028.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of symptomatic discoid menisci after total meniscectomy, saucerization, and suture repair of tears of a discoid meniscus at short- and long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the Pubmed and ScienceDirect databases in adherence with Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Short- and long-term follow-up were defined as an average follow-up of <4 years and >4 years, respectively. Pooled quantitative synthesis was performed on studies that reported results of total meniscectomy and saucerization in the same study. A systematic review was performed on studies that reported data on saucerization, total meniscectomy, and/or repair.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies for the short term and 22 for the long term were identified that met inclusion criteria for qualitative review. Of these, 4 short-term and 5 long-term studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. No significant differences in Ikeuchi scores are seen in the short-term studies between saucerization and total meniscectomy; however, the long-term studies did find a statistical difference favoring saucerization (P < .001). The differences noted between the preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores in the short term were 24.1 (95% conflict of interest: 10.25-37.95) in 3 studies and 22.38 (95% conflict of interest: 17.68-27.07) in the 4 long-term studies for saucerization. Suture repair with saucerization versus saucerization without suture repair revealed a statistical difference in only 1 of 5 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term data demonstrate significantly improved patient reported outcomes in favor of saucerization over total meniscectomy. Suture repair of tears of a lateral discoid meniscus does not demonstrate improved outcomes over partial meniscectomy without repair. Considering the cost of repair and lack of demonstrated improvement, based on the limited available data, we do not recommend repair of the abnormal anatomy in a torn lateral discoid meniscus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review.

摘要

目的

评估盘状半月板全切除术、盘状半月板撕裂成形术和盘状半月板缝合修复术后短期和长期随访时的手术效果。

方法

按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选条目进行了系统评价,检索了 Pubmed 和 ScienceDirect 数据库。短期和长期随访分别定义为平均随访时间<4 年和>4 年。对报告了同一研究中全切除术和盘状半月板撕裂成形术结果的研究进行了汇总定量分析。对报告了盘状半月板撕裂成形术、全切除术和/或修复术数据的研究进行了系统评价。

结果

共确定了 19 项短期研究和 22 项长期研究符合定性审查标准。其中,有 4 项短期研究和 5 项长期研究被纳入定量分析。短期研究中,盘状半月板撕裂成形术和全切除术的 Ikeuchi 评分无显著差异;然而,长期研究发现盘状半月板撕裂成形术具有统计学优势(P<.001)。短期研究中,盘状半月板撕裂成形术的术前和术后 Lysholm 评分差值为 3 项研究中的 24.1(95%置信区间:10.25-37.95)和 4 项长期研究中的 22.38(95%置信区间:17.68-27.07)。盘状半月板撕裂成形术加缝合修复与单纯盘状半月板撕裂成形术相比,只有 1 项研究有统计学差异。

结论

长期数据显示,盘状半月板撕裂成形术明显改善了患者报告的结局,优于全切除术。外侧盘状半月板撕裂的缝合修复并未显示出比部分切除术加不修复更好的结果。基于有限的现有数据,考虑到修复的成本和缺乏改善的证据,我们不建议修复撕裂的外侧盘状半月板的异常解剖结构。

证据等级

IV 级,系统评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验