Asadi-Pooya Ali A, Valente Kette, Alessi Ruda, Tinker Jennifer
Jefferson Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Neurosciences Research Center, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute and Department of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:210-212. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
We compared the semiology of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) between patients from the USA and Brazil. This international cross-cultural comparative study may expand understanding of PNES across the borders.
We retrospectively investigated all patients with PNES admitted to one epilepsy center in the USA and one in Brazil. We classified their seizures into four classes: generalized motor, akinetic, focal motor, and subjective symptoms. All patients were interviewed by an epileptologist in both countries and were administered psychological assessment measures, including questions about PNES risk factors. For the statistical analyses, we compared patients from the two nations.
Eighty-nine patients (49 from the USA and 40 from Brazil) were studied. Patients from the two countries were not significantly different with regard to sex and age, but patients from Brazil had earlier age at onset (26years vs. 34years; P=0.004) and a significantly greater delay in diagnosis (9.9years vs. 5.6years; P=0.001). Some characteristics of PNES were different between the two groups; patients from the USA had generally more seizure types and more often reported subjective seizures (55% in the USA vs. 10% in Brazil; P=0.0001). Clinical and historical characteristics of the patients were not significantly different.
Delay in diagnosis of PNES may represent a major factor in resource-limited countries. Large multicenter cross-cultural studies may reveal subtle but significant cross-cultural differences with respect to the semiological, clinical, and historical aspects of PNES; however, patients with PNES share more similarities than differences.
我们比较了美国和巴西患者心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的症状学。这项国际跨文化比较研究可能会拓展对PNES的跨国界理解。
我们回顾性调查了美国和巴西各一家癫痫中心收治的所有PNES患者。我们将他们的发作分为四类:全身性运动性发作、运动不能性发作、局灶性运动性发作和主观症状发作。两国的癫痫专家对所有患者进行了访谈,并对他们进行了心理评估,包括询问有关PNES危险因素的问题。为了进行统计分析,我们比较了两国的患者。
共研究了89例患者(49例来自美国,40例来自巴西)。两国患者在性别和年龄方面无显著差异,但巴西患者的发病年龄更早(26岁对34岁;P = 0.004),诊断延迟时间显著更长(9.9年对5.6年;P = 0.001)。两组PNES的一些特征有所不同;美国患者的发作类型通常更多,主观发作的报告也更频繁(美国为55%,巴西为10%;P = 0.0001)。患者的临床和病史特征无显著差异。
PNES诊断延迟可能是资源有限国家的一个主要因素。大型多中心跨文化研究可能会揭示PNES在症状学、临床和病史方面存在细微但显著的跨文化差异;然而,PNES患者的相似之处多于差异。