Suppr超能文献

经心腔内超声心动图从左心房进行经导管左心耳封堵术的操作指导。

Intracardiac Echocardiography From the Left Atrium for Procedural Guidance of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 13;10(21):2198-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.057. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) from the left atrium (LA) with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for procedural guidance of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

BACKGROUND

TEE with general anesthesia is the current gold standard to guide LAAO. By the use of ICE from the LA, LAAO can be performed in local anesthesia and may potentially have advantages over TEE.

METHODS

A single-center, cohort study of patients undergoing LAAO with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug or Amulet (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota). Procedures were guided by ICE from the LA with local anesthesia (n = 109) or TEE using general anesthesia (n = 107). All patients had pre-procedural cardiac computed tomography. Efficacy outcomes were technical success, procedural success, and peridevice leakage at TEE 8 weeks after LAAO. Safety outcome was a composite of periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 99% of both the TEE and ICE group. Procedural success was similar between groups: 94.4% success rate in the TEE-guided group, and 94.5% in the ICE-guided group. Major periprocedural complications occurred in 4.7% of the TEE group and 1.8% of the ICE group. Rate and degree of peridevice leak did not differ between groups at follow-up. Turnover time in the catheter laboratory, and contrast use were reduced with ICE.

CONCLUSIONS

LA ICE to guide LAAO as compared with TEE appears to be effective and safe, without increased procedure-related complications. The rate of peridevice leak is low and similar to TEE-guided procedures. Time spent in the catheterization room may decrease substantially.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经心腔内超声心动图(ICE)从左心房(LA)与经食管超声心动图(TEE)指导经导管左心耳封堵(LAAO)的疗效和安全性。

背景

TEE 联合全身麻醉是目前指导 LAAO 的金标准。通过使用 LA 内的 ICE,LAAO 可以在局部麻醉下进行,并且可能比 TEE 具有优势。

方法

这是一项单中心、队列研究,纳入在局部麻醉下使用 Amplatzer 心脏塞或 Amulet(圣犹达医疗公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗)行 LAAO 的患者(n=109)或在全身麻醉下使用 TEE 行 LAAO 的患者(n=107)。所有患者均行术前心脏计算机断层扫描。TEE 术后 8 周的疗效终点为技术成功率、程序成功率和经器械漏。安全性终点为围术期并发症的复合终点。

结果

TEE 和 ICE 组的技术成功率均达到 99%。两组的程序成功率相似:TEE 引导组成功率为 94.4%,ICE 引导组成功率为 94.5%。TEE 组发生 4.7%的围术期重大并发症,ICE 组发生 1.8%的围术期重大并发症。随访时两组之间经器械漏的发生率和程度无差异。与 TEE 相比,ICE 可减少导管实验室的周转时间和造影剂的使用。

结论

与 TEE 相比,LA ICE 引导 LAAO 似乎是有效且安全的,不会增加与手术相关的并发症。经器械漏的发生率较低,与 TEE 引导的手术相似。在导管室花费的时间可能会大大减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验