Negahban Hossein, Ebrahimzadeh Masoome, Mehravar Mohammad
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Orthopedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Oct 17;659:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.08.070. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
While several studies have investigated the interaction between postural control and secondary cognitive tasks in stroke patients, little is known about the influence of secondary motor task on postural control in these patients. The current research was designed to further examine dual-task performance by comparing the effects of cognitive versus motor dual-tasks on postural performance and weight bearing asymmetry (WBA) in stroke patients (n=23) relative to healthy, matched controls (n=22). All participants stood on dual-force plate under 5 conditions: (1) free standing; (2) simple cognitive task (easy Stroop) while standing; (3) difficult cognitive task (difficult Stroop) while standing; (4) simple motor task (holding a tray while a cylinder lying on its flat side) while standing; and (5) difficult motor task (holding a tray while a cylinder lying on its round side) while standing. The center of pressure (COP) measures was greater in stroke patients than healthy controls. Also, the WBA of the patients was greater than the controls. The COP measures increased when moving from single-task to cognitive dual-task conditions. No significant effect of motor dual-tasking was seen when moving from single-task to motor dual-task conditions. However, in contrast to cognitive dual-tasking, stroke patients and healthy controls employed different strategies during simultaneous performance of postural and motor tasks. It can be suggested that performing a motor task while standing requires greater attentional resources compared to performing a cognitive task while standing and this resulted in greater dual-task interference on motor performance in the stroke patients.
虽然有几项研究调查了中风患者姿势控制与次要认知任务之间的相互作用,但对于次要运动任务对这些患者姿势控制的影响却知之甚少。当前的研究旨在通过比较认知双任务与运动双任务对中风患者(n = 23)相对于健康匹配对照组(n = 22)的姿势表现和负重不对称(WBA)的影响,进一步检验双任务表现。所有参与者在5种条件下站在双力板上:(1)自由站立;(2)站立时进行简单认知任务(简易斯特鲁普任务);(3)站立时进行困难认知任务(困难斯特鲁普任务);(4)站立时进行简单运动任务(手持托盘,同时一个圆柱体平放在上面);(5)站立时进行困难运动任务(手持托盘,同时一个圆柱体侧放在上面)。中风患者的压力中心(COP)测量值高于健康对照组。此外,患者的负重不对称程度也高于对照组。从单任务状态转变为认知双任务状态时,COP测量值增加。从单任务状态转变为运动双任务状态时,未观察到运动双任务的显著影响。然而,与认知双任务不同的是,中风患者和健康对照组在同时进行姿势和运动任务时采用了不同的策略。可以认为,站立时执行运动任务比站立时执行认知任务需要更多的注意力资源,这导致中风患者在运动表现上受到更大的双任务干扰。