Suppr超能文献

帕洛诺司琼与格拉司琼对接受R-CHOP治疗的日本患者化疗所致恶心和呕吐的止吐效果比较

Comparison between Antiemetic Effects of Palonosetron and Granisetron on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Japanese Patients Treated with R-CHOP.

作者信息

Uchida Mayako, Mori Yasuo, Nakamura Tsutomu, Kato Koji, Kamezaki Kenjiro, Takenaka Katsuto, Shiratsuchi Motoaki, Kadoyama Kaori, Miyamoto Toshihiro, Akashi Koichi

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital.

Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

出版信息

Biol Pharm Bull. 2017;40(9):1499-1505. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b17-00318.

Abstract

In the present study, the antiemetic effect of palonosetron, not combined with dexamethasone and aprepitant, on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting was evaluated in patients with malignant lymphoma receiving first-line rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy, and was compared to that of granisetron. A total of 74 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included in this study (April 2007 to December 2015). Palonosetron (0.75 mg) or granisetron (3 mg) was intravenously administered before R-CHOP therapy. The proportions of patients with complete response (CR) during the overall (0-120 h after the start of R-CHOP therapy), acute (0-24 h) and delayed (24-120 h) phases were evaluated. CR was defined as no vomiting and no use of antiemetic rescue medication. A total of 32 and 42 patients were treated with palonosetron and granisetron, respectively. The CR rate in the palonosetron group was significantly higher than that in the granisetron group during the delayed phase (90.6 and 61.9%, respectively; p=0.007). Logistic regression analysis showed that use of palonosetron improved the CR rate during the delayed phase, compared to use of granisetron. Female sex, age less than 60 years, no habitual alcohol intake, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) score of 1 were significant risk factors associated with non-CR. The findings of this study suggested the superiority of palonosetron to granisetron, without accompanying dexamethasone and aprepitant, for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with malignant lymphoma.

摘要

在本研究中,对接受一线利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)治疗的恶性淋巴瘤患者,评估了未联合地塞米松和阿瑞匹坦的帕洛诺司琼对化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的止吐效果,并与格拉司琼进行了比较。本研究共纳入74例非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者(2007年4月至2015年12月)。在R-CHOP治疗前静脉注射帕洛诺司琼(0.75mg)或格拉司琼(3mg)。评估了总体(R-CHOP治疗开始后0-120小时)、急性(0-24小时)和延迟(24-120小时)阶段完全缓解(CR)患者的比例。CR定义为无呕吐且未使用止吐急救药物。分别有32例和42例患者接受了帕洛诺司琼和格拉司琼治疗。在延迟阶段,帕洛诺司琼组的CR率显著高于格拉司琼组(分别为90.6%和61.9%;p=0.007)。逻辑回归分析表明,与使用格拉司琼相比,使用帕洛诺司琼可提高延迟阶段的CR率。女性、年龄小于60岁、无习惯性饮酒以及东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG-PS)评分为1是与未达到CR相关的显著危险因素。本研究结果表明,在不联合地塞米松和阿瑞匹坦的情况下,帕洛诺司琼在治疗恶性淋巴瘤患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面优于格拉司琼。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验