Feuerstein T J, Bammert J, Meyer D K
Biol Cybern. 1987;56(5-6):419-29. doi: 10.1007/BF00319521.
The "pharmacological dogma" that competitive antagonists cause parallel shifts to the right with sustained maximum effect of semi-logarithmic concentration-response curves of exogenous agonists may not be true if an endogenous agonist is present in the preparation. In this case, the antagonist and the exogenous agonist interfere in a complex way with an existing circuit of regulation between the response and the endogenous agonist. In consequence, it is difficult to determine the true shift in the concentration-response curves as induced by the antagonist, since a deviation of the curves in a non-parallel manner can be observed. The extent of this deviation may be used to learn more about the variables involved. The present paper discusses this phenomenon: The regulatory circuit of the (auto)receptor modulated release of neutrotransmitters is used as an example. Paired samples of data are analysed in this example. Since the extent of the non-parallel deviation also depends on the manner in which the paired samples are mathematically linked, two different ways of data evaluation have been used. A theoretical model of the relation between receptor activation and response is proposed which allows to evaluate experimental concentration-response curves by means of non-linear regression analysis. This evaluation yields quantitative information on the parameters of the regulatory circuit: the concentration of the endogenous agonist, its KD value and the true shift of the concentration-response curve caused by the applied antagonist.
如果制剂中存在内源性激动剂,那么“药理学教条”——竞争性拮抗剂会使外源性激动剂的半对数浓度-反应曲线平行右移且最大效应持续不变——可能并不成立。在这种情况下,拮抗剂和外源性激动剂会以复杂的方式干扰反应与内源性激动剂之间现有的调节回路。因此,很难确定拮抗剂引起的浓度-反应曲线的真正移动,因为可以观察到曲线以非平行方式偏离。这种偏离的程度可用于更多地了解所涉及的变量。本文讨论了这一现象:以(自)受体调节神经递质释放的调节回路为例。在这个例子中分析了成对的数据样本。由于非平行偏离的程度还取决于成对样本在数学上的关联方式,因此使用了两种不同的数据评估方法。提出了一个受体激活与反应之间关系的理论模型,该模型允许通过非线性回归分析来评估实验浓度-反应曲线。这种评估产生了关于调节回路参数的定量信息:内源性激动剂的浓度、其解离常数(KD值)以及所施加拮抗剂引起的浓度-反应曲线的真正移动。