• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将欧洲高生产力的耕地转换为草地:- 碳封存的较差候选者。

Converting highly productive arable cropland in Europe to grassland: -a poor candidate for carbon sequestration.

机构信息

AHDB, Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth, Warwickshire, CV8 2TL, UK.

School of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11083-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-11083-6
PMID:28874831
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5585225/
Abstract

Sequestration of atmospheric CO as organic carbon by agricultural soils (SOC) is promoted as a climate change mitigation option. IPCC provides guidelines for determining carbon stocks and sequestration potential, incentivising policy changes towards management of farmland for carbon sequestration. However, the basis of the assumption that agricultural soils can sequester significant atmospheric CO has been questioned. We sought to determine the potential for conversion of arable cropland to grassland to sequester carbon in the short to medium term and potential limiting factors. There were no differences in SOC stocks in the top 30 cm between grassland up to 17 years old and arable cropland at 14 sites across the UK. However, SOC showed different distribution patterns, being concentrated in the top 10 cm under grassland. Soil microbial communities were significantly different between arable and grassland, with higher biomass and lesser dominance by bacteria in grassland soils. A land use conversion experiment showed these changes occurred within one year of land use change. Failure of grassland soils to accumulate SOC was attributed to reduced available soil nitrogen, resulting in low productivity. The implications of these results for carbon sequestration in soils as a climate change mitigation strategy are discussed.

摘要

农业土壤(SOC)将大气 CO 隔离为有机碳,被认为是一种缓解气候变化的选择。政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)提供了确定碳储量和固碳潜力的指南,鼓励政策朝着农田管理以实现碳固存的方向转变。然而,农业土壤可以大量固存大气 CO 的假设基础已经受到质疑。我们试图确定在短至中期内将耕地转化为草地以固碳的潜力及其潜在的限制因素。在英国的 14 个地点,在长达 17 年的时间里,草地的表层 30 厘米 SOC 储量与耕地之间没有差异。然而,SOC 表现出不同的分布模式,在草地下集中在表层 10 厘米。土壤微生物群落在耕地和草地之间有显著差异,草地土壤中的生物量较高,细菌的优势度较低。土地利用转换实验表明,这些变化在土地利用变化后的一年内就发生了。草地土壤未能积累 SOC 归因于可利用土壤氮的减少,导致生产力低下。这些结果对作为气候变化缓解策略的土壤碳固存的影响进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a44/5585225/d051864d147c/41598_2017_11083_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a44/5585225/ed6dbcbbd832/41598_2017_11083_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a44/5585225/f89508370d9b/41598_2017_11083_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a44/5585225/d051864d147c/41598_2017_11083_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a44/5585225/ed6dbcbbd832/41598_2017_11083_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a44/5585225/f89508370d9b/41598_2017_11083_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a44/5585225/d051864d147c/41598_2017_11083_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Converting highly productive arable cropland in Europe to grassland: -a poor candidate for carbon sequestration.将欧洲高生产力的耕地转换为草地:- 碳封存的较差候选者。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11083-6.
2
Carbon sequestration potential of soils in southeast Germany derived from stable soil organic carbon saturation.德国东南部土壤固碳潜力源于稳定的土壤有机碳饱和。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Feb;20(2):653-65. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12384. Epub 2013 Nov 17.
3
Projected changes in mineral soil carbon of European croplands and grasslands, 1990-2080.1990 - 2080年欧洲农田和草地矿质土壤碳的预测变化
Glob Chang Biol. 2005 Dec;11(12):2141-2152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001075.x. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
4
Soil organic carbon stocks in European croplands and grasslands: How much have we lost in the past decade?欧洲农田和草地的土壤有机碳储量:在过去十年中我们损失了多少?
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jan;30(1):e16992. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16992. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
5
Potential of temperate agricultural soils for carbon sequestration: A meta-analysis of land-use effects.温带农业土壤固碳潜力:土地利用效应的荟萃分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.067. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
The centennial legacy of land-use change on organic carbon stocks of German agricultural soils.德国农业土壤有机碳储量的土地利用变化百年遗产。
Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Aug;30(8):e17444. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17444.
7
Carbon sequestration in European croplands.欧洲农田的碳固存
SEB Exp Biol Ser. 2005:47-55.
8
Carbon storage capacity of semi-arid grassland soils and sequestration potentials in northern China.中国北方半干旱草原土壤的碳储存能力和固碳潜力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Oct;21(10):3836-45. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12957. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
9
Soil organic carbon storage following conversion from cropland to grassland on sites differing in soil drainage and erosion history.土壤排水和侵蚀历史不同的耕地转为草地后土壤有机碳的储存。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 15;661:481-491. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.200. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
10
[Profile distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in a black soil as affected by land use types].[土地利用类型对黑土土壤有机碳剖面分布及储量的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Apr;26(4):965-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulation-based assessment of the soil organic carbon sequestration in grasslands in relation to management and climate change scenarios.基于模拟的草地土壤有机碳固存与管理及气候变化情景的评估。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 17;9(6):e17287. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17287. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Conversion effects of farmland to Zanthoxylum bungeanum plantations on soil organic carbon mineralization in the arid valley of the upper reaches of Yangtze River, China.将耕地转换为花椒种植园对中国长江上游干旱河谷土壤有机碳矿化的转化效应。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0262961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262961. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Soil resilience and recovery: rapid community responses to management changes.土壤恢复力与恢复:群落对管理变化的快速响应
Plant Soil. 2017;412(1):283-297. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3068-x. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
Ecosystem carbon stocks and sequestration potential of federal lands across the conterminous United States.美国本土联邦土地的生态系统碳储量及固碳潜力
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 13;112(41):12723-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1512542112. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Differential Effects of Conservational Management on SOC Accumulation in the Grasslands of China.
Structural and functional microbial diversity of sandy soil under cropland and grassland.
农田和草地土壤中微生物的结构和功能多样性
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 2;8:e9501. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9501. eCollection 2020.
保护性管理对中国草原土壤有机碳积累的差异化影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0137280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137280. eCollection 2015.
4
Phospholipid fatty acid profiling of microbial communities--a review of interpretations and recent applications.微生物群落的磷脂脂肪酸分析——解读与近期应用综述
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Nov;119(5):1207-18. doi: 10.1111/jam.12902. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
The greenhouse gas balance of European grasslands.欧洲草原的温室气体平衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Oct;21(10):3748-61. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12998. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
6
Potential carbon sequestration of European arable soils estimated by modelling a comprehensive set of management practices.通过模拟一套综合管理措施估计欧洲耕地土壤的潜在碳固存。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Nov;20(11):3557-67. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12551. Epub 2014 May 2.
7
Carbon sequestration: managing forests in uncertain times.碳固存:在不确定的时代管理森林。
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):153-5. doi: 10.1038/506153a.
8
Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China's 'Grain-for-Green' Program: a synthesis.土地利用转换与中国“退耕还林”工程中土壤碳储量变化:综述
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Nov;20(11):3544-56. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12508. Epub 2014 May 16.
9
Microorganisms and climate change: terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options.微生物与气候变化:陆地反馈及缓解选择。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Nov;8(11):779-90. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2439.
10
Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe--a review.21世纪初欧洲农业变革的生态影响——综述
J Environ Manage. 2009 Oct;91(1):22-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 29.