van Dongen Thijs T C F, de Graaf Johan, Plat Marie-Christine J, Huizinga Eelco P, Janse Jacobine, van der Krans Arie C, Leenen Luke P H, Hoencamp Rigo
Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Simon Smitweg 1, 2353 GA Leiderdorp, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Defense Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defense, Herculeslaan 1, 3584 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mil Med. 2017 Sep;182(9):e1864-e1870. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-17-00007.
An important factor within the military medical logistical chain is the capability of expeditious evacuation from point of injury, through a Medical Treatment Facility, to the country of residence where highest level of care can be provided. Although many factors can relate to patient outcome, the evaluation of the medical evacuation chain related to long-term patient outcome can be important for investigating possibilities for performance improvement in this domain. This article aims to provide a means to evaluate the quality of care of the medical evacuation chain.
Repatriated service members from the Afghan theater between 2004 and 2014 were invited to participate in a survey concerning functional outcome and quality of life using Lower Extremity Functional Scale, Short Form health survey 36, and EuroQol-6D questionnaires. Possible associations between these outcomes were analyzed in respect to duration of medical evacuation from point of injury to arrival in the Dutch military hospital. The duration was dichotomized into within and after 72 hours. Ordinal regression was used to analyze a possible association with duration as a continuous variable.
Sixty percent (28/47) of battle casualties arrived in The Netherlands within 72 hours. For the nonbattle injury cohort this was 30% (7/23). Of those who became ill, 18% (5/28) was evacuated in 72 hours. No significant independent associations between interval duration and measured outcomes were found.
Repatriated battle casualties had lower outcome scores compared to the disease nonbattle injured service members. Significant differences in functional outcome and quality of life with respect to evacuation duration were not found. Specialized tactical evacuation and en route care capability during strategic evacuation contributed to relative high standards of care. Combined with our results, this could implicate that delivery of the right care to the right patient at the right time is a justifiable paradigm. The main focus of the medical support organization is to offer the highest level of care per echelon as soon as possible in conjunction with facilitating maximum social support through expeditious evacuation out of theater. Further research using semistructured interviews among the direct circle around battle casualties, including caregivers, is needed to provide insight into these complex matters.
军事医疗后勤链中的一个重要因素是从受伤点迅速后送,经医疗设施,至能提供最高水平治疗的居住国的能力。尽管许多因素可能与患者预后相关,但评估与患者长期预后相关的医疗后送链对于研究该领域绩效改进的可能性可能很重要。本文旨在提供一种评估医疗后送链护理质量的方法。
邀请2004年至2014年间从阿富汗战区遣返的军人参与一项使用下肢功能量表、简短健康调查问卷36和欧洲五维度健康量表6D问卷的关于功能结局和生活质量的调查。就从受伤点至抵达荷兰军事医院的医疗后送时长而言,分析了这些结局之间可能存在的关联。时长被分为72小时内和72小时后。使用有序回归分析作为连续变量的时长可能存在的关联。
60%(28/47)的战斗伤员在72小时内抵达荷兰。非战斗受伤队列的这一比例为30%(7/23)。在患病人员中,18%(5/28)在72小时内后送。未发现间隔时长与所测结局之间存在显著的独立关联。
与因病非战斗受伤的军人相比,遣返的战斗伤员的结局得分较低。未发现功能结局和生活质量在撤离时长方面存在显著差异。战略撤离期间的专业战术后送和途中护理能力促成了相对较高的护理标准。结合我们的结果,这可能意味着在正确的时间为正确的患者提供正确的护理是一个合理的范式。医疗支持组织的主要重点是尽快在每个梯队提供最高水平的护理,同时通过迅速撤离战区促进最大程度的社会支持。需要对包括护理人员在内的战斗伤员直接圈子进行半结构化访谈的进一步研究,以深入了解这些复杂问题。