Suppr超能文献

医院中的资源分配标准。

Resource allocation criteria in a hospital.

作者信息

Bodina A, Pavan A, Castaldi S

机构信息

Postgraduate School in Public Health, University of Milan, Italy.

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Prev Med Hyg. 2017 Jun;58(2):E184-E189.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Allocate fixed resources among competing users is a challenge in terms of hospital management in order to obtain the best performance considering strategic objectives. In order to address this need, a system of evaluation in an important research and teaching hospital was designed. This study describes resource allocation criteria in a hospital focusing on the evaluation system and its developed application methodology.

METHODS

The indicator system allows the strategic management to rapidly detect the priorities in the evaluations of the Strategic, Organizational, Managerial, Economic, Research and Qualitative conditions of each unit. The chosen indicators are expressed with three numerical values, (1 indicating critical status, 2 acceptable conditions and 3 a good operational situation).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The adopted evaluation system considered different thematic areas: Strategic, Organizational, Managerial, Economic, Research and Qualitative. In order to define each area, 3 fields of evaluation have been chosen. The indicators have been structured according to a pyramid system allowing creating a single indicator for each area for each unit. Furthermore, a single indicator has been fixed in order to facilitate a first consideration on whether to carry out or not closer examinations of the most critical units. This manuscript describes an attempt to define objective criteria for the allocation of scarce resources in order to achieve the hospital's strategic objectives. The indicators identified allow to obtain an overall score for each unit, which allows the management to prioritize the needs.

摘要

引言

在医院管理中,在相互竞争的用户之间分配固定资源是一项挑战,以便在考虑战略目标的情况下获得最佳绩效。为满足这一需求,设计了一个重要研究和教学医院的评估系统。本研究描述了一家医院中侧重于评估系统及其开发的应用方法的资源分配标准。

方法

指标体系使战略管理能够快速检测每个单位在战略、组织、管理、经济、研究和质量状况评估中的优先事项。所选指标用三个数值表示,(1表示关键状态,2表示可接受状态,3表示良好运营状况)。

结果与讨论

采用的评估系统考虑了不同的主题领域:战略、组织、管理、经济、研究和质量。为定义每个领域,选择了3个评估领域。指标按照金字塔系统进行构建,以便为每个单位的每个领域创建一个单一指标。此外,确定了一个单一指标,以便于首先考虑是否对最关键的单位进行更深入的检查。本手稿描述了为实现医院战略目标而定义稀缺资源分配客观标准的尝试。所确定的指标允许为每个单位获得一个总体分数,这使管理层能够确定需求的优先级。

相似文献

1
Resource allocation criteria in a hospital.
J Prev Med Hyg. 2017 Jun;58(2):E184-E189.
2
Priority-setting and hospital strategic planning: a qualitative case study.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8(4):197-201. doi: 10.1258/135581903322403254.
3
The planning cycle.
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005 Summer;19(3):56-64.
4
Disinvestment for re-allocation: a process to identify priorities in healthcare.
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):137-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
6
Strategic management process in hospitals.
World Hosp Health Serv. 2001;37(1):2-5, 33-4.
7
Making choices in hospital resources allocation. The use of an assessment tool to decide which new projects are financed.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Winter;12(1):163-71. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009491.
9
Evaluation of the impact of program budgeting and marginal analysis in Vancouver Island Health Authority.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Oct;14(4):234-42. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008182.

引用本文的文献

1
Needs assessment and prioritization of key medical specialties: A telemedicine roadmap based on a mixed-methods framework.
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 26;11:20552076251374215. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374215. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Exploring the Economic Aspects of Hospitals: A Comprehensive Examination of Relevant Factors.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 25;16(2):e54867. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54867. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Quality Improvement Initiatives in Reforming Patient Support Groups-Three-Year Outcomes.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7155. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197155.

本文引用的文献

1
Setting healthcare priorities in hospitals: a review of empirical studies.
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Apr;30(3):386-96. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu010. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
3
Evaluating priority setting success in healthcare: a pilot study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 May 19;10:131. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-131.
4
Ethical criteria for allocating health-care resources.
Lancet. 2009 Apr 25;373(9673):1424-5; author reply 1425-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60816-3.
5
Cutting the cake: supporting environmental fund allocation decisions.
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验